137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31091857)
21. [The rubber dam in dental practice: use and practical advice].
Minoodt I; Slaus G; Bottenberg P
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 16082879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical in-situ evaluation of the effect of rubber dam isolation on bond strength to enamel.
Falacho RI; Melo EA; Marques JA; Ramos JC; Guerra F; Blatz MB
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 36325593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does operatory field isolation influence the performance of direct adhesive restorations?
Daudt E; Lopes GC; Vieira LC
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Feb; 15(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 23534003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Attitude of graduate dental students in The Netherlands towards rubber dam use].
de Kuijper MCFM; Tenge K; Gresnigt MMM
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Feb; 130(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 36748678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Handling protocol of posterior composites Rubber Dam.
Strydom C
SADJ; 2005 Aug; 60(7):292-3. PubMed ID: 16184985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rubber dam application in endodontic practice: an update on critical educational and ethical dilemmas.
Ahmed HM; Cohen S; Lévy G; Steier L; Bukiet F
Aust Dent J; 2014 Dec; 59(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 25091028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The rubber dam-retaining appliance: an adjunct to isolation during placement of multiple veneers.
Liebenberg WH
Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 8935035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extending the use of rubber dam isolation: alternative procedures. Part I.
Liebenberg WH
Quintessence Int; 1992 Oct; 23(10):657-65. PubMed ID: 1289946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new rubber dam frame design--easier to use with a more secure fit.
Ahlers MO
Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 12731602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing Behavior Outcomes with Rubber Dam or IsoVac Isolation in Patients Undergoing Moderate Sedation.
Current JL; Unkel JH; Berry EJ; Reinhartz J; Reinhartz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2022 May; 89(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 35986476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations' survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Moro BLP; Tedesco TK; Freitas RD; Pássaro AL; Garbim JR; Oliveira R; Mendes FM; ; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):440. PubMed ID: 36217147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparison of Three Rubber Dam Systems In Vivo--A Preliminary Study.
Kapitán M; Suchánková Kleplová T; Suchánek J
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2015; 58(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26454802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Secondary retention of rubber dam: effective moisture control access considerations.
Liebenberg WH
Quintessence Int; 1995 Apr; 26(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 7568743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Manipulation of rubber dam septa: an aid to the meticulous isolation of splinted prostheses.
Liebenberg WH
J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 7673823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A literature review of clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and future preference of Isolite and DryShield dental isolation systems among pediatric patients.
Bagher SM; Sabbagh HJ
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Jul; 47(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 37408340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN.
Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Pihlstrom DJ; Amundson CW; Gordan VV;
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 20945739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minor tooth movement by means of rubber-dam elastics.
HIRSCHFELD L; JAY J
J Am Dent Assoc; 1955 Mar; 50(3):282-300. PubMed ID: 13232959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Rubber dam isolation of cervical lesions. Part 2: Application of the 'modified gingival retractor'.
Liebenberg WH
FDI World; 1994; 3(6):6-8, 10. PubMed ID: 9552655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.
Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez I; Lisboa AH; Higashi C; Queiroz VA; Rego RO; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):581-93. PubMed ID: 26158415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Time taken to position a rubber dam by fourth year dental students at the University of Montreal].
Baltadjian H; Mahseredjian S
J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Mar; 58(3):228-9. PubMed ID: 1555127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
