These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31092080)
1. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix in predicting successful membrane sweeping: a prospective observational study. Rizzo G; Aloisio F; Yacoub M; Bitsadze V; Słodki M; Makatsariya A; D'Antonio F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):852-858. PubMed ID: 31092080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a nomogram for prediction of successful membrane sweeping Haj Yahya R; Ezra Y; Berghella V; Herzberg S; Safrai M; Reuveni Salzman A; Abu Ahmad W; Kabiri D J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1401-1406. PubMed ID: 29141473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study. Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton multiparous women: a prospective cohort study. Rizzo G; Mappa I; Maqina P; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Makatsariya A; D'Antonio F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7787-7793. PubMed ID: 34121577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women. Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of delivery after 40 weeks by antepartum ultrasound in singleton nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study. Rizzo G; Mappa I; Bitsadze V; Maruotti GM; Makatsariya A; D'Antonio F Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 Nov; 2(4):100193. PubMed ID: 33345913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting success of labor induction in singleton term pregnancies by combining maternal and ultrasound variables. Prado CA; Araujo Júnior E; Duarte G; Quintana SM; Tonni G; Cavalli Rde C; Marcolin AC J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26742573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal and fetal characteristics for predicting risk of Cesarean section following induction of labor: pooled analysis of PROBAAT trials. Quach D; Ten Eikelder M; Jozwiak M; Davies-Tuck M; Bloemenkamp KWM; Mol BW; Li W Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 34490668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. Cheung CW; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Chan OK; Chan LW; Fung TY; Lau TK J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Dec; 23(12):1406-12. PubMed ID: 20230317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of membrane sweeping on cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography and impact of cervical shortening on cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Khine PP; Sabdin NH; Vallikkannu N; Sulaiman S J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Feb; 30(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 21266561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound assessment of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: prediction of spontaneous onset of labor and successful vaginal delivery. Vankayalapati P; Sethna F; Roberts N; Ngeh N; Thilaganathan B; Bhide A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 18260158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Chandra S; Crane JM; Hutchens D; Young DC Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 98(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 11430948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bishop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor: the effect of parity. Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2009; 36(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 19400416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor. Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]