181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31092146)
1. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
Barim MS; Sesek RF; Capanoglu MF; Drinkaus P; Schall MC; Gallagher S; Davis GA
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modification of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation to Determine the Individual Manual Lifting Risk in Malaysia's Manufacturing Industry.
Dawad NA; Yasin SM; Darus A; Jamil AT; Nyi Naing N
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57747. PubMed ID: 38715993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
Dehghan P; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion.
Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ergonomics case study: revised NIOSH lifting equation instruction issues for students.
Cole SS; McGlothlin J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Nov; 6(11):D73-81. PubMed ID: 19750405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
Fox RR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E; Jaeger M
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102897. PubMed ID: 31422239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine?
Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ACGIH lifting threshold limit values to validated low back disorder lifting assessment methods outcomes.
Hafez K; Jorgensen MJ; Amick RZ
Work; 2023; 76(3):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37125603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of conventional 2D video for quantifying upper limb kinematics in repetitive motion occupational tasks.
Chen CH; Azari DP; Hu YH; Lindstrom MJ; Thelen D; Yen TY; Radwin RG
Ergonomics; 2015; 58(12):2057-66. PubMed ID: 25978764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
Garg A; Kapellusch JM
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low-back pain associated with manual lifting: a one-year prospective study.
Lu ML; Waters TR; Krieg E; Werren D
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 24669544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Maximum acceptable weight of lift for manual lifting tasks].
Chen J; Yang L
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 16701027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Logistic Regression Model for Biomechanical Risk Classification in Lifting Tasks.
Donisi L; Cesarelli G; Capodaglio E; Panigazzi M; D'Addio G; Cesarelli M; Amato F
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36359468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
