274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31092346)
1. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
Kim G; Phillips J; Cole E; Brook A; Mehta T; Slanetz P; Fishman MDC; Karimova E; Mehta R; Lotfi P; Resteghini N; Raj S; Dialani V
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 31092346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study.
Lalji UC; Houben IP; Prevos R; Gommers S; van Goethem M; Vanwetswinkel S; Pijnappel R; Steeman R; Frotscher C; Mok W; Nelemans P; Smidt ML; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MB
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4371-4379. PubMed ID: 27097789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.
Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O
Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
Tsigginou A; Gkali C; Chalazonitis A; Feida E; Vlachos DE; Zagouri F; Rellias I; Dimitrakakis C
Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20160397. PubMed ID: 27452266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.
Fallenberg EM; Schmitzberger FF; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Mann RM; Renz DM; Bick U; Hamm B; Dromain C
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2752-2764. PubMed ID: 27896471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Women with Palpable Breast Abnormalities.
Amir T; Pinker K; Sevilimedu V; Hughes M; Keating DT; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 37949703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial).
Phillips J; Mehta TS; Portnow LH; Fishman MDC; Zhang Z; Pisano ED
Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230530. PubMed ID: 37962503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
Covington MF
Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB
J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Diekmann F; Freyer M; Diekmann S; Fallenberg EM; Fischer T; Bick U; Pöllinger A
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19931350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
Cozzi A; Magni V; Zanardo M; Schiaffino S; Sardanelli F
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):568-581. PubMed ID: 34904875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
