These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31092346)

  • 1. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
    Kim G; Phillips J; Cole E; Brook A; Mehta T; Slanetz P; Fishman MDC; Karimova E; Mehta R; Lotfi P; Resteghini N; Raj S; Dialani V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 31092346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Nissan N; Comstock CE; Sevilimedu V; Gluskin J; Mango VL; Hughes M; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e232580. PubMed ID: 39352285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study.
    Lalji UC; Houben IP; Prevos R; Gommers S; van Goethem M; Vanwetswinkel S; Pijnappel R; Steeman R; Frotscher C; Mok W; Nelemans P; Smidt ML; Beets-Tan RG; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MB
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4371-4379. PubMed ID: 27097789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral mammography (CESM): a retrospective study involving 644 breast lesions.
    Travieso-Aja MDM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Vega Benítez V; Pérez-Luzardo O
    Radiol Med; 2019 Oct; 124(10):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 31250270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
    Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Women with Palpable Breast Abnormalities.
    Amir T; Pinker K; Sevilimedu V; Hughes M; Keating DT; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 37949703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.
    Tsigginou A; Gkali C; Chalazonitis A; Feida E; Vlachos DE; Zagouri F; Rellias I; Dimitrakakis C
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 89(1067):20160397. PubMed ID: 27452266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.
    Fallenberg EM; Schmitzberger FF; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Engelken F; Mann RM; Renz DM; Bick U; Hamm B; Dromain C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2752-2764. PubMed ID: 27896471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associations with breast density and patient's characteristics.
    Magni V; Cozzi A; Muscogiuri G; Benedek A; Rossini G; Fanizza M; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
    Radiol Med; 2024 Sep; 129(9):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 39060886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial).
    Phillips J; Mehta TS; Portnow LH; Fishman MDC; Zhang Z; Pisano ED
    Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230530. PubMed ID: 37962503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
    Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Miller MM; Mayorov S; Ganti R; Nguyen JV; Rochman CM; Caley M; Jahjah J; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA; Rooney TB
    J Breast Imaging; 2024 May; 6(3):277-287. PubMed ID: 38537570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
    Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
    Covington MF
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
    Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.