These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31092346)

  • 21. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
    Cozzi A; Magni V; Zanardo M; Schiaffino S; Sardanelli F
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):568-581. PubMed ID: 34904875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting.
    Tennant SL; James JJ; Cornford EJ; Chen Y; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Girio-Fragkoulakis C
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27296475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme.
    Lobbes MB; Lalji U; Houwers J; Nijssen EC; Nelemans PJ; van Roozendaal L; Smidt ML; Heuts E; Wildberger JE
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1668-76. PubMed ID: 24696228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Diekmann F; Freyer M; Diekmann S; Fallenberg EM; Fischer T; Bick U; Pöllinger A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 19931350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis of Patient Preferences for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI as Supplemental Screening Options for Breast Cancer.
    Berg WA; Bandos AI; Sava MG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Aug; 20(8):758-768. PubMed ID: 37394083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
    Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
    Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of single-view contrast-enhanced mammography as novel reading strategy: a non-inferiority feasibility study.
    Lobbes MBI; Hecker J; Houben IPL; Pluymakers R; Jeukens C; Laji UC; Gommers S; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6211-6219. PubMed ID: 31073859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The accuracy of titanium contrast-enhanced mammography: a retrospective multicentric study.
    González-Huebra I; Malmierca P; Elizalde A; Etxano J; Vejborg I; Uhlenbrock D; Pina L
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1335-1342. PubMed ID: 31979977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
    Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
    Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Radiomics Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes.
    Zhu S; Wang S; Guo S; Wu R; Zhang J; Kong M; Pan L; Gu Y; Yu S
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2228-2238. PubMed ID: 38142176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Role of contrast-enhanced mammogram as an adjunct to tomosynthesis in evaluation of circumscribed breast lesions.
    Porkodi D; Devimeenal J
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Oct; 97(1162):1696-1705. PubMed ID: 39024041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient preferences regarding use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer screening.
    Son D; Phillips J; Mehta TS; Mehta R; Brook A; Dialani VM
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S229-S238. PubMed ID: 33846061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Addition of Contrast-enhanced Mammography to Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Prospective TOCEM Trial Interim Analysis.
    Berg WA; Berg JM; Bandos AI; Vargo A; Chough DM; Lu AH; Ganott MA; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Hartman JY; Waheed U; Hakim CM; Harnist KS; Reginella RF; Shinde DD; Carlin BA; Cohen CS; Wallace LP; Sumkin JH; Zuley ML
    Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e231991. PubMed ID: 38687218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.
    Calabrò N; Abruzzese F; Valentini E; Gambaro ACL; Attanasio S; Cannillo B; Brambilla M; Carriero A
    Radiol Med; 2024 Jul; 129(7):989-998. PubMed ID: 38987501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.