These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31092928)
1. Transcriptional cofactors display specificity for distinct types of core promoters. Haberle V; Arnold CD; Pagani M; Rath M; Schernhuber K; Stark A Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7759):122-126. PubMed ID: 31092928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The features of Drosophila core promoters revealed by statistical analysis. Gershenzon NI; Trifonov EN; Ioshikhes IP BMC Genomics; 2006 Jun; 7():161. PubMed ID: 16790048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compatibility rules of human enhancer and promoter sequences. Bergman DT; Jones TR; Liu V; Ray J; Jagoda E; Siraj L; Kang HY; Nasser J; Kane M; Rios A; Nguyen TH; Grossman SR; Fulco CP; Lander ES; Engreitz JM Nature; 2022 Jul; 607(7917):176-184. PubMed ID: 35594906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements. Silver BD; Willett CG; Maher KA; Wang D; Deal RB G3 (Bethesda); 2024 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 38253712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Broad compatibility between yeast UAS elements and core promoters and identification of promoter elements that determine cofactor specificity. Schofield JA; Hahn S Cell Rep; 2023 Apr; 42(4):112387. PubMed ID: 37058407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eukaryotic enhancers: common features, regulation, and participation in diseases. Erokhin M; Vassetzky Y; Georgiev P; Chetverina D Cell Mol Life Sci; 2015 Jun; 72(12):2361-75. PubMed ID: 25715743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative imaging of transcription in living Drosophila embryos reveals the impact of core promoter motifs on promoter state dynamics. Pimmett VL; Dejean M; Fernandez C; Trullo A; Bertrand E; Radulescu O; Lagha M Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4504. PubMed ID: 34301936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TATA and paused promoters active in differentiated tissues have distinct expression characteristics. Ramalingam V; Natarajan M; Johnston J; Zeitlinger J Mol Syst Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e9866. PubMed ID: 33543829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Widespread regulatory specificities between transcriptional co-repressors and enhancers in Jacobs J; Pagani M; Wenzl C; Stark A Science; 2023 Jul; 381(6654):198-204. PubMed ID: 37440660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Super-enhancers include classical enhancers and facilitators to fully activate gene expression. Blayney JW; Francis H; Rampasekova A; Camellato B; Mitchell L; Stolper R; Cornell L; Babbs C; Boeke JD; Higgs DR; Kassouf M Cell; 2023 Dec; 186(26):5826-5839.e18. PubMed ID: 38101409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regeneration and developmental enhancers are differentially compatible with minimal promoters. Begeman IJ; Emery B; Kurth A; Kang J Dev Biol; 2022 Dec; 492():47-58. PubMed ID: 36167150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From promoter motif to cardiac function: a single DPE motif affects transcription regulation and organ function in vivo. Sloutskin A; Itzhak D; Vogler G; Pozeilov H; Ideses D; Alter H; Adato O; Shachar H; Doniger T; Shohat-Ophir G; Frasch M; Bodmer R; Duttke SH; Juven-Gershon T Development; 2024 Jul; 151(14):. PubMed ID: 38958007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulatory architecture of housekeeping genes is driven by promoter assemblies. Dejosez M; Dall'Agnese A; Ramamoorthy M; Platt J; Yin X; Hogan M; Brosh R; Weintraub AS; Hnisz D; Abraham BJ; Young RA; Zwaka TP Cell Rep; 2023 May; 42(5):112505. PubMed ID: 37182209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ZFX acts as a transcriptional activator in multiple types of human tumors by binding downstream from transcription start sites at the majority of CpG island promoters. Rhie SK; Yao L; Luo Z; Witt H; Schreiner S; Guo Y; Perez AA; Farnham PJ Genome Res; 2018 Mar; 28(3):310-320. PubMed ID: 29429977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cis and trans effects differentially contribute to the evolution of promoters and enhancers. Mattioli K; Oliveros W; Gerhardinger C; Andergassen D; Maass PG; Rinn JL; Melé M Genome Biol; 2020 Aug; 21(1):210. PubMed ID: 32819422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancer selectivity in space and time: from enhancer-promoter interactions to promoter activation. Yang JH; Hansen AS Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2024 Jul; 25(7):574-591. PubMed ID: 38413840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative cofactor screens show the influence of transactivation domains and core promoters on the mechanisms of transcription. Bell CC; Balic JJ; Talarmain L; Gillespie A; Scolamiero L; Lam EYN; Ang CS; Faulkner GJ; Gilan O; Dawson MA Nat Genet; 2024 Jun; 56(6):1181-1192. PubMed ID: 38769457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcriptional activation by bidirectional RNA polymerase II elongation over a silent promoter. Leupin O; Attanasio C; Marguerat S; Tapernoux M; Antonarakis SE; Conrad B EMBO Rep; 2005 Oct; 6(10):956-60. PubMed ID: 16113646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]