These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31093500)
21. Micro-Computed Tomography-Guided Artificial Intelligence for Pulp Cavity and Tooth Segmentation on Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Lin X; Fu Y; Ren G; Yang X; Duan W; Chen Y; Zhang Q J Endod; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1933-1941. PubMed ID: 34520812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of 3D reconstructions based on cone beam computed tomography. Maret D; Molinier F; Braga J; Peters OA; Telmon N; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Cossié A; Kahn JL; Sixou M J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1465-9. PubMed ID: 20929716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Designing a novel dental root analogue implant using cone beam computed tomography and CAD/CAM technology. Moin DA; Hassan B; Mercelis P; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():25-7. PubMed ID: 22092354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study. Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional reconstruction of teeth and jaws based on segmentation of CT images using watershed transformation. Naumovich SS; Naumovich SA; Goncharenko VG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140313. PubMed ID: 25564886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of in situ cone beam computed tomography scan data with ex vivo optical scan data in the measurement of root surface area. Jia P; Yang G; Hu W; Chung KH; Zhao Y; Liu M; Chen CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Nov; 128(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31171483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 3D exemplar-based random walks for tooth segmentation from cone-beam computed tomography images. Pei Y; Ai X; Zha H; Xu T; Ma G Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5040. PubMed ID: 27587034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible. Van Dessel J; Huang Y; Depypere M; Rubira-Bullen I; Maes F; Jacobs R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130145. PubMed ID: 23833320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling]. Zhang HR; Yin LF; Liu YL; Yan LY; Wang N; Liu G; An XL; Liu B Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 36(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29779276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D-Printed Artificial Teeth: Accuracy and Application in Root Canal Therapy. Liang X; Liao W; Cai H; Jiang S; Chen S J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2018 Aug; 14(8):1477-1485. PubMed ID: 29903062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 3D printed replicas for endodontic education. Reymus M; Fotiadou C; Kessler A; Heck K; Hickel R; Diegritz C Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):123-130. PubMed ID: 29900562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT. Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-Dimensional (3D) Stereolithographic Tooth Replicas Accuracy Evaluation: In Vitro Pilot Study for Dental Auto-Transplant Surgical Procedures. Mastrangelo F; Battaglia R; Natale D; Quaresima R Materials (Basel); 2022 Mar; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35407711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A level-set based approach for anterior teeth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography images. Ji DX; Ong SH; Foong KW Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():116-28. PubMed ID: 24853776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shaping ability of protaper next compared with waveone in late-model three-dimensional printed teeth. Cui Z; Wei Z; Du M; Yan P; Jiang H BMC Oral Health; 2018 Jun; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 29940905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method. Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of segmentation of tooth structures using 3 different CBCT machines. Shaheen E; Khalil W; Ezeldeen M; Van de Casteele E; Sun Y; Politis C; Jacobs R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Jan; 123(1):123-128. PubMed ID: 27938942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of volumetric measurement of teeth in vivo based on cone beam computer tomography. Wang Y; He S; Yu L; Li J; Chen S Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 22008300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of automatic segmentation of teeth using a watershed-based method. Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Telmon N; Calvet A; Michetti J; Maret D Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170220. PubMed ID: 28937285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography. Hassan B; Couto Souza P; Jacobs R; de Azambuja Berti S; van der Stelt P Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 19506922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]