357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094138)
1. Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study.
Ausiello PP; Ciaramella S; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Borges AL; Tribst JP; Dal Piva A; Garcia-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2019 Apr; 32(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 31094138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Di Rienzo A; Lanzotti A; Ventre M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 31395448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of different adhesive filling material and mass combinations to restore class II cavities under loading and shrinkage effects: a 3D-FEA.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; De Benedictis A; Lanzotti A; Tribst JPM; Watts DC
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Apr; 24(5):485-495. PubMed ID: 33090047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Oglakci B; Kazak M; Donmez N; Dalkilic EE; Koymen SS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190042. PubMed ID: 31778443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress relieving behaviour of flowable composite liners: A finite element analysis.
Anatavara S; Sitthiseripratip K; Senawongse P
Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 27251991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without an intermediate layer: Effect of polymerization shrinkage parameters of the layer material.
Han SH; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Park SH
J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():41-48. PubMed ID: 30391684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavities and bonding status of resin composites on the mechanical property of endodontically-treated teeth: A finite element study.
Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Fok ASL; Lee R
Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 34930622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A standardized method to determine the effect of polymerization shrinkage on the cusp deflection and shrinkage induced built-in stress of class II tooth models.
Pottier JG; Gregg A; Aregawi W; Nasiri E; Fok A; Liu Y; Kreplak L; Price RB; Labrie D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103987. PubMed ID: 32771951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical Behavior of Alkasite Posterior Restorations in Comparison to Polymeric Materials: A 3D-FEA Study.
Ausiello P; Dal Piva AMO; di Lauro AE; Garcia-Godoy F; Testarelli L; Tribst JPM
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 35458251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques.
Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Bicalho AA; Ribeiro MTH; Price RB; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
