These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094327)
1. Health Information Technologies in the Support Systems of Pregnant Women and Their Caregivers: Mixed-Methods Study. Dorst MT; Anders SH; Chennupati S; Chen Q; Purcell Jackson G J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e10865. PubMed ID: 31094327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Women Use Digital Technologies for Health: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study. Lupton D; Maslen S J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e11481. PubMed ID: 30681963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information Resources Among Flemish Pregnant Women: Cross-sectional Study. Lanssens D; Thijs IM; Dreesen P; Van Hecke A; Coorevits P; Gaethofs G; Derycke J; Tency I JMIR Form Res; 2022 Oct; 6(10):e37866. PubMed ID: 36222794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer health-related needs of pregnant women and their caregivers. Robinson JR; Anders SH; Novak LL; Simpson CL; Holroyd LE; Bennett KA; Jackson GP JAMIA Open; 2018 Jul; 1(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 30474071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What topics are women interested in during pregnancy: exploring the role of social media as informational and emotional support. Lee JY; Lee E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jun; 22(1):517. PubMed ID: 35754031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pregnant Women Sharing Pregnancy-Related Information on Facebook: Web-Based Survey Study. Harpel T J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e115. PubMed ID: 29567636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: a focus group study. Lupton D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jul; 16(1):171. PubMed ID: 27435182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internet networks as a source of social support for women with mobility disabilities during pregnancy. Peterson-Besse JJ; Knoll JE; Horner-Johnson W Disabil Health J; 2019 Oct; 12(4):722-726. PubMed ID: 31130492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Social networking and Internet use among pelvic floor patients: a multicenter survey. Mazloomdoost D; Kanter G; Chan RC; Deveaneau N; Wyman AM; Von Bargen EC; Chaudhry Z; Elshatanoufy S; Miranne JM; Chu CM; Pauls RN; Arya LA; Antosh DD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):654.e1-654.e10. PubMed ID: 27319368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital technologies as sources of information for patients and caregivers during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey. Hassan AYI; Bronzini M; Lamura G Digit Health; 2023; 9():20552076231156214. PubMed ID: 36908378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communication Technology Use and Preferences for Pregnant Women and Their Caregivers. Shroder M; Anders SH; Dorst M; Jackson GP AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2018; 2018():1515-1523. PubMed ID: 30815197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Platform Uses for Help and Support Seeking of Parents With Children Affected by Disabilities: Scoping Review. Gruebner O; van Haasteren A; Hug A; Elayan S; Sykora M; Albanese E; Naslund J; Wolf M; Fadda M; von Rhein M J Med Internet Res; 2022 Dec; 24(12):e37972. PubMed ID: 36472896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A survey-based study of Zika virus communication preferences among pregnant women in Georgia, United States. Ellingson MK; Bonk CM; Chamberlain AT BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):325. PubMed ID: 28950830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family. Schor EL; Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Paging "Dr. Google": does technology fill the gap created by the prenatal care visit structure? Qualitative focus group study with pregnant women. Kraschnewski JL; Chuang CH; Poole ES; Peyton T; Blubaugh I; Pauli J; Feher A; Reddy M J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e147. PubMed ID: 24892583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Crowdsourcing and Friendsourcing: A Social Media-Based Feasibility Study to Support Alzheimer Disease Caregivers. Bateman DR; Brady E; Wilkerson D; Yi EH; Karanam Y; Callahan CM JMIR Res Protoc; 2017 Apr; 6(4):e56. PubMed ID: 28396304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listening to Communities: Mixed-Method Study of the Engagement of Disadvantaged Mothers and Pregnant Women With Digital Health Technologies. Guendelman S; Broderick A; Mlo H; Gemmill A; Lindeman D J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e240. PubMed ID: 28679489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology preferences among caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. Naftel RP; Safiano NA; Falola MI; Shannon CN; Wellons JC; Johnston JM J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2013 Jan; 11(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23092227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Young People's Use of Digital Health Technologies in the Global North: Narrative Review. Lupton D J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e18286. PubMed ID: 33427684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informal Caregivers' Experiences and Perceptions of a Web-Based Peer Support Network: Mixed-Methods Study. Vaughan C; Trail TE; Mahmud A; Dellva S; Tanielian T; Friedman E J Med Internet Res; 2018 Aug; 20(8):e257. PubMed ID: 30154074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]