These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094545)

  • 1. Quantifying uncertainty in the meta-analytic lower bound estimate.
    Brannick MT; Potter S; Teng Y
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):754-773. PubMed ID: 31094545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capturing the underlying distribution in meta-analysis: Credibility and tolerance intervals.
    Brannick MT; French KA; Rothstein HR; Kiselica AM; Apostoloski N
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):264-290. PubMed ID: 33543583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean correlation corrected for Case IV range restriction: a more adequate procedure for meta-analysis.
    Li JC; Cui Y; Chan W
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 23088495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of heterogeneity and heterogeneity interval estimators in random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference in education and psychology.
    Boedeker P; Henson RK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):346-364. PubMed ID: 31599614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two random-effects methods of meta-analysis.
    Hall SM; Brannick MT
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):377-89. PubMed ID: 12002964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Multilevel Standardized Effect Size.
    Lai MHC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):558-578. PubMed ID: 32279536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
    Jackson D; Bowden J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?
    Field AP
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):444-67. PubMed ID: 16392999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computing confidence intervals for standardized regression coefficients.
    Jones JA; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 24079926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods.
    Field AP
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Jun; 6(2):161-80. PubMed ID: 11411440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model confidence bounds for variable selection.
    Li Y; Luo Y; Ferrari D; Hu X; Qin Y
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 30648746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.