These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094561)

  • 21. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability.
    Smith AM; Wells GL; Lindsay RC; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):127-145. PubMed ID: 27685645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.
    Gronlund SD; Carlson CA; Dailey SB; Goodsell CA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):140-152. PubMed ID: 19586253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2021 Sep; 7():519-541. PubMed ID: 34270349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.
    Lindsay RC; Lea JA; Nosworthy GJ; Fulford JA; Hector J; LeVan V; Seabrook C
    J Appl Psychol; 1991 Dec; 76(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 1774217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of disguise on identification decisions and confidence with simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Bertrand MI; Kalmet N; Melsom EI; Lindsay RCL
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 33444064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.
    Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An expected cost model of eyewitness identification.
    Yang Y; Smalarz L; Moody SA; Cabell JJ; Copp CJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):205-219. PubMed ID: 31045389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Configural and component processing in simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.
    Flowe HD; Smith HM; Karoğlu N; Onwuegbusi TO; Rai L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 25665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?
    Kaesler M; Dunn JC; Ransom K; Semmler C
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):35. PubMed ID: 32754862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers' decisions to place a suspect in a lineup.
    Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 34968099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
    Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating lineup fairness: Variations across methods and measures.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Kalmet N; Bertrand MI; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):103-115. PubMed ID: 27685644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications.
    Charman SD; Quiroz V
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 27227276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.