147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094645)
1. Trends in the Use of Laparoscopy and Robotics for Colorectal Cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens J; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jul; 29(7):926-933. PubMed ID: 31094645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. National trends and disparities of minimally invasive surgery for localized renal cancer, 2010 to 2015.
Xia L; Talwar R; Taylor BL; Shin MH; Berger IB; Sperling CD; Chelluri RR; Zambrano IA; Raman JD; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):182.e17-182.e27. PubMed ID: 30630732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.
Selby LV; DeMatteo RP; Tholey RM; Jarnagin WR; Garcia-Aguilar J; Strombom PD; Allen PJ; Kingham TP; Weiser MR; Brennan MF; Strong VE
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28299807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery.
Addae JK; Gani F; Fang SY; Wick EC; Althumairi AA; Efron JE; Canner JK; Euhus DM; Schneider EB
J Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 208():111-120. PubMed ID: 27993198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends of robotic-assisted surgery for thyroid, colorectal, stomach and hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer: 10 year Korea trend investigation.
An L; Hwang KS; Park SH; Kim YN; Baek SJ; Park S; Hyung WJ; Chung WY; Kim SH;
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 32571714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Emergency Settings.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():75-82. PubMed ID: 31158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Disparities in minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Merchea A; Kasi PM; Crandall M; Colibaseanu DT
Am J Surg; 2019 Aug; 218(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 30503514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disparities in the use of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease.
Robinson CN; Balentine CJ; Sansgiry S; Berger DH
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):897-903; discussion 903-4. PubMed ID: 22411487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.
Stewart CL; Ituarte PHG; Melstrom KA; Warner SG; Melstrom LG; Lai LL; Fong Y; Woo Y
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2591-2601. PubMed ID: 30357525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insurance Disparities in Access to Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.
Childers CP; Uppal A; Tillman M; Chang GJ; Tran Cao HS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 30(6):3560-3568. PubMed ID: 36943527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.
Price JT; Zimmerman LD; Koelper NC; Sammel MD; Lee S; Butts SF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):572.e1-572.e10. PubMed ID: 28784416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disparities influencing rates of urgent/emergent surgery for diverticulitis in the state of Florida.
Lemini R; Spaulding AC; Osagiede O; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens JM; Crandall M; Cima RR; Colibaseanu DT
Am J Surg; 2020 Jun; 219(6):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 31526510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.
Morton AJ; Simpson A; Humes DJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 28(1):9. PubMed ID: 38078978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.
Justiniano CF; Becerra AZ; Loria A; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Temple LK; Fleming FJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5618-5626. PubMed ID: 35024928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
