These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094645)

  • 21. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hayden DM; Korous KM; Brooks E; Tuuhetaufa F; King-Mullins EM; Martin AM; Grimes C; Rogers CR
    Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3306-3320. PubMed ID: 36520224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
    Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.
    Keller DS; Parikh N; Senagore AJ
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 27572064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Care: A Quality and Cost Disparity.
    Fader AN; Weise RM; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Bristow RE; Makary MA; Pronovost PJ; Hutfless S; Dowdy SC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 26646127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
    Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Bernier GV; Flum DR; Kumar AS; Moonka R; Thirlby RC; Simianu VV
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 33206328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.
    Mayo JS; Brazer ML; Bogenberger KJ; Tavares KB; Conrad RJ; Lustik MB; Gillern SM; Park CW; Richards CR
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2805-2816. PubMed ID: 32591939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variability between individual surgeons in route of hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer in Florida.
    Carrubba AR; Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Hodge DO; Robertson MW; DeStephano CC
    Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 31():55-60. PubMed ID: 31539642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
    Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
    Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
    Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.
    Warps AK; Saraste D; Westerterp M; Detering R; Sjövall A; Martling A; Dekker JWT; Tollenaar RAEM; Matthiessen P; Tanis PJ;
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5986-6001. PubMed ID: 35258664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hospital factors strongly influence robotic use in general surgery.
    Stewart CL; Dumitra S; Nota C; Ituarte PHG; Melstrom LG; Woo Y; Singh G; Fong Y; Nathan H; Warner SG
    Surgery; 2019 Nov; 166(5):867-872. PubMed ID: 31208862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
    Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
    Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy.
    Tsui C; Klein R; Garabrant M
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2253-7. PubMed ID: 23660720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.
    Halabi WJ; Kang CY; Jafari MD; Nguyen VQ; Carmichael JC; Mills S; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
    World J Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(12):2782-90. PubMed ID: 23564216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade.
    Patel R; Pant K; Patel KS; Merchant AM; Alvarez-Downing MM
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3750-3762. PubMed ID: 34462866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.