These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094672)

  • 1. Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates.
    Stewart PA; Eubanks AD; Miller J
    Politics Life Sci; 2019 May; 38(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 31094672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Candidate Performance and Observable Audience Response: Laughter and Applause-Cheering During the First 2016 Clinton-Trump Presidential Debate.
    Stewart PA; Eubanks AD; Dye RG; Gong ZH; Bucy EP; Wicks RH; Eidelman S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1182. PubMed ID: 30079040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Psychobiographical and Psycho-Political Comparison of Clinton and Trump.
    Elovitz PH
    J Psychohist; 2016; 44(2):90-113. PubMed ID: 29442485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Micro-Expressions of Fear During the 2016 Presidential Campaign Trail: Their Influence on Trait Perceptions of Donald Trump.
    Stewart PA; Svetieva E
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():608483. PubMed ID: 34149502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elections, news cycles, and attention to disasters.
    Bright CF
    Disaster Prev Manag; 2017; 26(4):471-478. PubMed ID: 30443109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assaults on Days of Campaign Rallies During the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Morrison CN; Ukert B; Palumbo A; Dong B; Jacoby SF; Wiebe DJ
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jul; 29(4):490-493. PubMed ID: 29543668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's third presidential debate.
    Kashif F; Farooqi R; Tariq S; Nusrat A; Ashraf F; Raees A
    Heliyon; 2022 Sep; 8(9):e10518. PubMed ID: 36119880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handedness and the 2016 U.S. Primaries: consistent handedness predicts support for Donald Trump among republicans, but gender predicts support for Hillary Clinton among democrats.
    Prichard EC; Christman SD
    Laterality; 2020 Nov; 25(6):641-653. PubMed ID: 32842873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symbolic disempowerment and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election: Mental health responses among Latinx and white populations.
    Morey BN; García SJ; Nieri T; Bruckner TA; Link BG
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Nov; 289():114417. PubMed ID: 34656819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Happy warriors" revisited: hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news.
    Bucy EP; Grabe ME
    Politics Life Sci; 2008 Mar; 27(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 19213305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election.
    Bryden J; Silverman E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214854. PubMed ID: 30964900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism.
    Pfattheicher S; Schindler S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153419. PubMed ID: 27128318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exposure to televised political campaign advertisements aired in the United States 2015-2016 election cycle and psychological distress.
    Niederdeppe J; Avery RJ; Liu J; Gollust SE; Baum L; Barry CL; Welch B; Tabor E; Lee NW; Fowler EF
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 May; 277():113898. PubMed ID: 33848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The revolt of the Rust Belt: place and politics in the age of anger.
    McQuarrie M
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S120-S152. PubMed ID: 29114874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    An R; Ji M
    Am J Health Behav; 2018 Sep; 42(5):21-31. PubMed ID: 30688638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump.
    Bovet A; Morone F; Makse HA
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8673. PubMed ID: 29875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.