240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31094716)
1. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supracervical Hysterectomy Is Protective against Mesh Complications after Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 12,189 Patients.
Dallas K; Taich L; Kuhlmann P; Rogo-Gupta L; Eilber K; Anger JT; Scott V
J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):669-676. PubMed ID: 34694142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tension-free vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of perioperative outcomes using a Japanese national inpatient database.
Obinata D; Sugihara T; Yasunaga H; Mochida J; Yamaguchi K; Murata Y; Yoshizawa T; Matsui T; Matsui H; Sasabuchi Y; Fujimura T; Homma Y; Takahashi S
Int J Urol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):655-659. PubMed ID: 29729035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Chaudhry Z; Cohen SA; Tarnay C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 27636219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension Versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Elevated Body Mass Index: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Stairs J; Minassian V; Clancy A
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 35234179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset.
Caveney M; Haddad D; Matthews C; Badlani G; Mirzazadeh M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048. PubMed ID: 28407297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.
Boyd BAJ; Winkelman WD; Mishra K; Vittinghoff E; Jacoby VL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):405.e1-405.e7. PubMed ID: 33984303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.
Antosh DD; Dieter AA; Balk EM; Kanter G; Kim-Fine S; Meriwether KV; Mamik MM; Good MM; Singh R; Alas A; Foda MA; Rahn DD; Rogers RG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):475.e1-475.e19. PubMed ID: 34087227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy.
Tyson MD; Wolter CE
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Feb; 34(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 24265258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.
Wu YM; Reid J; Chou Q; MacMillan B; Leong Y; Welk B
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 30327850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample.
Slopnick EA; Petrikovets A; Sheyn D; Kim SP; Nguyen CT; Hijaz AK
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):603-609. PubMed ID: 30283975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association Between Concomitant Hysterectomy and Repeat Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in a Cohort of Nearly 100,000 Women.
Dallas K; Elliott CS; Syan R; Sohlberg E; Enemchukwu E; Rogo-Gupta L
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 132(6):1328-1336. PubMed ID: 30334856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
