132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3109632)
1. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?
Soutter WP; Wisdom S; Brough AK; Monaghan JM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jan; 93(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 3942709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?
Anderson DJ; Flannelly GM; Kitchener HC; Fisher PM; Mann EM; Campbell MK; Templeton A
BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6845):84-7. PubMed ID: 1638252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of colposcopy in sexually transmitted diseases clinic based on first year's experience.
Byrne MA; Taylor-Robinson D; Anderson MA; Mason P; Harris JR
Genitourin Med; 1989 Jan; 65(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 2921051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for cervical cancer: a new scope for general practitioners? Results of the first year of colposcopy in general practice.
Chomet J
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1326-8. PubMed ID: 3109641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conservative treatment of mild/moderate cervical dyskaryosis: long-term outcome.
Kirby AJ; Spiegelhalter DJ; Day NE; Fenton L; Swanson K; Mann EM; Macgregor JE
Lancet; 1992 Apr; 339(8797):828-31. PubMed ID: 1347856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Cuzick J; Wolfendale MR; Jones JJ; Balogun-Lynch C; Usherwood MM; Singer A
Lancet; 1992 Jun; 339(8807):1440-3. PubMed ID: 1351129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How significant is a cervical smear showing glandular dyskaryosis?
Pisal NV; Sindos M; Desai S; Mansell E; Singer A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jun; 108(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 12781413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears.
Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Walker P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1067-70. PubMed ID: 2804009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
