BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31096765)

  • 1. Simple Post-Processing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measurements Improves Endpoints in Clinical Trials.
    Jensen MH; Dethlefsen C; Hejlesen O; Vestergaard P
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 14(6):1074-1078. PubMed ID: 31096765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extensive Assessment of Blood Glucose Monitoring During Postprandial Period and Its Impact on Closed-Loop Performance.
    Biagi L; Hirata Bertachi A; Conget I; Quirós C; Giménez M; Ampudia-Blasco FJ; Rossetti P; Bondia J; Vehí J
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 28633537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions.
    Boscari F; Galasso S; Facchinetti A; Marescotti MC; Vallone V; Amato AML; Avogaro A; Bruttomesso D
    Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Feb; 28(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29258716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of continuous glucose monitoring on low interstitial glucose values and low blood glucose values assessed by point-of-care blood glucose meters: results of a crossover trial.
    Hermanns N; Schumann B; Kulzer B; Haak T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):516-22. PubMed ID: 24876615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and Time Delay of Glucose Measurements of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Bedside Artificial Pancreas During Hyperglycemic and Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Glucose Clamp Study.
    Kuroda A; Taniguchi S; Akehi Y; Mori H; Tamaki M; Suzuki R; Otsuka Y; Matsuhisa M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1096-1100. PubMed ID: 28992720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Time Delay in Three Continuous Glucose Monitors for Adolescents and Adults.
    Sinha M; McKeon KM; Parker S; Goergen LG; Zheng H; El-Khatib FH; Russell SJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1132-1137. PubMed ID: 28459159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Older Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Using Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin: Results From the DIAMOND Trial.
    Ruedy KJ; Parkin CG; Riddlesworth TD; Graham C;
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28449590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypoglycemic Accuracy and Improved Low Glucose Alerts of the Latest Dexcom G4 Platinum Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
    Peyser TA; Nakamura K; Price D; Bohnett LC; Hirsch IB; Balo A
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Aug; 17(8):548-54. PubMed ID: 25961446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a CGM Sensor in Pediatric Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes. Comparison of Three Insertion Sites: Arm, Abdomen, and Gluteus.
    Faccioli S; Del Favero S; Visentin R; Bonfanti R; Iafusco D; Rabbone I; Marigliano M; Schiaffini R; Bruttomesso D; Cobelli C;
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1147-1154. PubMed ID: 28486841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of "Simple Post-Processing of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measurements Improves Endpoints in Clinical Trials".
    Schmelzeisen-Redeker G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 14(6):1079-1080. PubMed ID: 31195814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
    Avari P; Moscardo V; Jugnee N; Oliver N; Reddy M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 31375042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of predicted low suspend pump treatment on improving glycaemic control and quality of sleep in children with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers: the QUEST randomized crossover study.
    Schierloh U; Aguayo GA; Fichelle M; De Melo Dias C; Celebic A; Vaillant M; Barnard K; Cohen O; de Beaufort C
    Trials; 2018 Dec; 19(1):665. PubMed ID: 30509293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of BGM Accuracy on the Clinical Performance of CGM: An In-Silico Study.
    Campos-Náñez E; Breton MD
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1196-1206. PubMed ID: 28560900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions.
    Kropff J; Bruttomesso D; Doll W; Farret A; Galasso S; Luijf YM; Mader JK; Place J; Boscari F; Pieber TR; Renard E; DeVries JH
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2015 Apr; 17(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 25132320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HypoDE: Research Design and Methods of a Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Impact of Real-Time CGM Usage on the Frequency of CGM Glucose Values <55 mg/dl in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Problematic Hypoglycemia Treated With Multiple Daily Injections.
    Heinemann L; Deiss D; Hermanns N; Graham C; Kaltheuner M; Liebl A; Price D
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 May; 9(3):651-62. PubMed ID: 25759183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated multivariable artificial pancreas control system.
    Turksoy K; Quinn LT; Littlejohn E; Cinar A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):498-507. PubMed ID: 24876613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous glucose monitors: use of waveform versus glycemic values in the improvements of glucose control, quality of life, and fear of hypoglycemia.
    Walker TC; Yucha CB
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 May; 8(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 24876611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Reduces Hypoglycemia in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Type 1 Diabetes in an At-Home Randomized Crossover Study: Results of the PROLOG Trial.
    Forlenza GP; Li Z; Buckingham BA; Pinsker JE; Cengiz E; Wadwa RP; Ekhlaspour L; Church MM; Weinzimer SA; Jost E; Marcal T; Andre C; Carria L; Swanson V; Lum JW; Kollman C; Woodall W; Beck RW
    Diabetes Care; 2018 Oct; 41(10):2155-2161. PubMed ID: 30089663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Zaharieva DP; Turksoy K; McGaugh SM; Pooni R; Vienneau T; Ly T; Riddell MC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(6):313-321. PubMed ID: 31059282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Impact of Blood Glucose Monitoring Accuracy: An In-Silico Study.
    Campos-Náñez E; Fortwaengler K; Breton MD
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1187-1195. PubMed ID: 28569076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.