These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31097132)

  • 1. Should Cone Beam Computed Tomography Be Routinely Obtained in Implant Planning?
    Omami G; Al Yafi F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):363-379. PubMed ID: 31097132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report.
    Benavides E; Rios HF; Ganz SD; An CH; Resnik R; Reardon GT; Feldman SJ; Mah JK; Hatcher D; Kim MJ; Sohn DS; Palti A; Perel ML; Judy KW; Misch CE; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 22382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
    Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
    Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
    Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
    Ganz SD
    Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure.
    Yepes JF; Al-Sabbagh M
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 59(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 25434558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
    Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Assessment of Three Different Alveolar Ridge Dimension Measurement Methods before Implant Placement: An
    Das A; Vijayakumar DB; Sathe S; Sapri AMS; Thomas PA; Kappiamkunnath S; Singh PK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Sep; 24(9):651-654. PubMed ID: 38152937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
    Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of restoratively projected and surgically acceptable virtual implant position for mandibular overdentures.
    Scarfe W; Vaughn WS; Farman AG; Harris BT; Paris MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 22299087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research.
    Bornstein MM; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):51-72. PubMed ID: 28000270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein J; Hatcher DC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 141 Suppl 3():19S-24S. PubMed ID: 20884936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
    Peck JN; Conte GJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II).
    Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Hamel J; Schlegel KA; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 38(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 19939691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.