These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31097309)

  • 1. A wearable device to monitor ocular comfort.
    Read ML; Morgan PB; Maldonado-Codina C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Oct; 42(5):569-574. PubMed ID: 31097309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring ocular discomfort using a wrist-mounted electronic logger.
    Read ML; Navascues-Cornago M; Keir N; Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Oct; 43(5):476-483. PubMed ID: 32151528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal changes in contact lens comfort over a day of wear.
    Woods CA; Bentley SA; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Nov; 36(6):643-648. PubMed ID: 27790772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ocular discomfort responses after short periods of contact lens wear.
    Papas E; Tilia D; McNally J; de la Jara PL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 92(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 26001894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tear menisci and ocular discomfort during daily contact lens wear in symptomatic wearers.
    Chen Q; Wang J; Shen M; Cui L; Cai C; Li M; Li K; Lu F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Apr; 52(5):2175-80. PubMed ID: 21051728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comfort response of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
    Varikooty J; Keir N; Richter D; Jones LW; Woods C; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Sep; 90(9):945-53. PubMed ID: 23892493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diurnal Variation in Comfort in Contact Lens and Non-contact Lens Wearers.
    Dumbleton KA; Guillon M; Theodoratos P; Patel T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):820-7. PubMed ID: 27362615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers.
    Nason RJ; Boshnick EL; Cannon WM; Dubow BW; Freeman MI; Kame RT; Lanier JC; Lopanik RW; Quinn TG; Rigel LE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):774-80. PubMed ID: 7822675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consequences of wear interruption for discomfort with contact lenses.
    Papas EB; Tilia D; Tomlinson D; Williams J; Chan E; Chan J; Golebiowski B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 91(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 24141634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of contact lens wear on ocular surface mucins using a novel clinical fluorescence imaging system.
    Read ML; Navascues-Cornago M; Keir N; Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Aug; 43(4):378-388. PubMed ID: 31451311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the Bruder moist heat eye compress on contact lens discomfort in contact lens wearers: An open-label randomized clinical trial.
    Tichenor AA; Cox SM; Ziemanski JF; Ngo W; Karpecki PM; Nichols KK; Nichols JJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Dec; 42(6):625-632. PubMed ID: 31587960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of lens and solution choice on the comfort of contact lens wearers.
    Tilia D; Lazon de la Jara P; Peng N; Papas EB; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 May; 90(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 23538435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Short Recovery Periods on Ocular Comfort During Daily Lens Wear.
    Stahl U; Keir NJ; Landers A; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 27362613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of daily disposable senofilcon A contact lenses in a symptomatic population.
    Bishop MJ; Sun CK; Coles-Brennan C; Gallois-Bernos A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Oct; 45(5):101574. PubMed ID: 35101386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Symptoms in a population of contact lens and noncontact lens wearers under different environmental conditions.
    González-Méijome JM; Parafita MA; Yebra-Pimentel E; Almeida JB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 84(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 17435502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers.
    Young G; Veys J; Pritchard N; Coleman S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Nov; 22(6):516-27. PubMed ID: 12477016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact Lens-Induced Discomfort and Protein Changes in Tears.
    Masoudi S; Stapleton FJ; Willcox MD
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):955-62. PubMed ID: 27232900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
    Dumbleton KA; Woods CA; Jones LW; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology.
    Vidal-Rohr M; Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN; Cerviño A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Feb; 41(1):117-121. PubMed ID: 28927731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding Ocular Discomfort and Dryness Using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire.
    Li W; Graham AD; Lin MC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154753. PubMed ID: 27137908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.