These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31097525)

  • 1. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
    Booth BD; Watts J; Dufour M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neuropsychologist experts and neurolaw: cases, controversies, and admissibility challenges.
    Kaufmann PM
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(6):739-55. PubMed ID: 24115139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The admissibility of expert evidence in Canada.
    Glancy GD; Bradford JM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 17872558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D; Zappalà A; Santtila P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Avoiding ipse dixit mislabeling: post-Daubert approaches to expert clinical opinions.
    Gutheil TG; Bursztajn H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 12875499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liability for the psychiatrist expert witness.
    Binder RL
    Am J Psychiatry; 2002 Nov; 159(11):1819-25. PubMed ID: 12411212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The expert witness in forensic psychiatry.
    Chaplow DG; Peters JL; Kydd RR
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 26(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 1476528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.
    Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E
    Med Law; 2008 Dec; 27(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 19202854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A consideration of the relationship between the Rules of Court and the Code of Ethics in forensic psychiatry.
    Gaughwin PC
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2004; 38(1-2):20-5. PubMed ID: 14731190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterodoxy, iconoclasm and spuriousness: the limits of novel expert evidence.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18251417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychiatrists as expert witnesses.
    Gutheil TG
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 Nov; 161(11):2141. PubMed ID: 15514437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Hired guns," "charlatans," and their "voodoo psychobabble": case law references to various forms of perceived bias among mental health expert witnesses.
    Edens JF; Smith ST; Magyar MS; Mullen K; Pitta A; Petrila J
    Psychol Serv; 2012 Aug; 9(3):259-271. PubMed ID: 22545822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Brief History of the Expert Witness.
    Milroy CM
    Acad Forensic Pathol; 2017 Dec; 7(4):516-526. PubMed ID: 31240003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolving legal standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Black B
    Science; 1988 Mar; 239(4847):1508-12. PubMed ID: 3281252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.