423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31098422)
1. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies increase the rate of cancer detection in populations with a low incidence of prostate cancer.
Kaushal R; Das CJ; Singh P; Dogra PN; Kumar R
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 May; 60(3):156-161. PubMed ID: 31098422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.
Mozer P; Rouprêt M; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; de Gorski A; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24552477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.
Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study.
Pham THN; Schulze-Hagen MF; Rahnama'i MS
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 Feb; 7(2):e1962. PubMed ID: 38217298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; van der Muelen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 30017964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: an early experience.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Endo J; Hashida K; Tomonaga T; Nakano M; Sugiyama T; Tajiri T; Terachi T; Uchida T
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 25316213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive zonal fusion biopsy of the prostate: Original technique between target and saturation.
Galosi AB; Maselli G; Sbrollini G; Donatelli G; Montesi L; Tallè M; Montironi R
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Dec; 88(4):292-295. PubMed ID: 28073195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental diagnostic value of targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion versus 14-fragments prostatic biopsy: a prospective controlled study.
Mariotti GC; Falsarella PM; Garcia RG; Queiroz MRG; Lemos GC; Baroni RH
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 28687911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
