502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31098658)
1. Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.
Irer B; Sahin MO; Erbatu O; Yildiz A; Ongun S; Cinar O; Cihan A; Sahin M; Sen V; Ucer O; Kizilay F; Bozkurt O;
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):769-774. PubMed ID: 31098658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.
Yao F; Jiang X; Xie B; Liu N
BMC Urol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):126. PubMed ID: 34517851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.
Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones.
Gong Z; Li Y; Zhang H; Pan C; Li J; Liu G; Bai S
Urolithiasis; 2023 Jun; 51(1):86. PubMed ID: 37272997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Wang P; Zhan Y; Li J; Liu G; Li Z; Bai S
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 36729301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.
Scotland KB; Safaee Ardekani G; Chan JYH; Paterson RF; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):661-666. PubMed ID: 30860394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones.
Ceylan Y; Ucer O; Bozkurt O; Gunlusoy B; Mertoglu O; Zumrutbas AE; Yildiz G; Irer B; Muezzinoglu T; Demir O
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Jun; 27(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 28697638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease: prospective outcomes over 4.5 years.
Ghosh A; Oliver R; Way C; White L; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1757-1764. PubMed ID: 28620694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective comparative analysis of 124 patients.
Karadag MA; Demir A; Cecen K; Bagcioglu M; Kocaaslan R; Altunrende F
Urol J; 2014 Nov; 11(5):1867-72. PubMed ID: 25361706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.
Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L
Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of immediate versus post-stenting ureteroscopy for ureteral stones treatment.
Sabhan AH
J Med Life; 2023 Dec; 16(12):1745-1749. PubMed ID: 38585524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
