BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3109993)

  • 21. Clinical practice guidelines. Review of the recommendations for colorectal screening.
    Anderson J
    Geriatrics; 2000 Feb; 55(2):67-73; quiz 74. PubMed ID: 10711308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Colonoscopy evaluations: justification by cost?
    Rex DK; Mark D; Clarke B; Lappas JC; Lehman GA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Mar; 91(3):614-5. PubMed ID: 8633528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer.
    Provenzale D
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2002 Jan; 12(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 11916165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness, benefit harm and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Austria.
    Jahn B; Sroczynski G; Bundo M; Mühlberger N; Puntscher S; Todorovic J; Rochau U; Oberaigner W; Koffijberg H; Fischer T; Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Öfner D; Renner F; Jonas M; Hackl M; Ferlitsch M; Siebert U;
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):209. PubMed ID: 31805871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Screening for colon cancer: economics and related considerations.
    Gelfand DW
    Semin Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 31(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 8848734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    El-Serag HB; Petersen L; Hampel H; Richardson P; Cooper G
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(20):2202-8. PubMed ID: 17101937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening of colorectal cancer.
    Bader JP
    Dig Dis Sci; 1986 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):43S-56S. PubMed ID: 3089745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
    Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening for gastrointestinal neoplasia: efficacy and cost of two different approaches in a clinical rehabilitation centre.
    Manus B; Brägelmann R; Armbrecht U; Stolte M; Stockbrügger RW
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Feb; 5(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8664809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation and therapy of the patient with fecal occult blood loss: a decision analysis.
    Lashner BA; Silverstein MD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Sep; 85(9):1088-95. PubMed ID: 2117850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Value-of-information analysis to guide future research in colorectal cancer screening.
    Hassan C; Hunink MG; Laghi A; Pickhardt PJ; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Di Giulio E
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):745-52. PubMed ID: 19789242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Colorectal cancer screening in Italy: feasibility and cost-effectiveness in a model area.
    Sorrentino D; Paduano R; Bernardis V; Piccolo A; Bartoli E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1999 Jun; 11(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 10418938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Quebec Association of Gastroenterology position paper on colorectal cancer screening - 2003.
    Barkun AN; Jobin G; Cousineau G; Dubé S; Lahaie R; Paré P; Stein B; Wassef R;
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 18(8):509-19. PubMed ID: 15372115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial.
    Griffith JM; Lewis CL; Brenner AR; Pignone MP
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():4. PubMed ID: 18218084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: technical problems and acceptability].
    Gonvers JJ
    Soz Praventivmed; 1986; 31(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 3716626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Strategies for screening for colorectal carcinoma.
    England WL; Halls JJ; Hunt VB
    Med Decis Making; 1989; 9(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2492069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Determination of cost-effective strategies in colorectal cancer screening].
    Dervaux B; Eeckhoudt L; Lebrun T; Sailly JC
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1992; 40(5):296-306. PubMed ID: 1480806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening for colorectal cancer in a high-risk population. Results of a mathematical model.
    Eddy DM; Nugent FW; Eddy JF; Coller J; Gilbertsen V; Gottlieb LS; Rice R; Sherlock P; Winawer S
    Gastroenterology; 1987 Mar; 92(3):682-92. PubMed ID: 3102307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Limitations of combined flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema in patients with rectal bleeding.
    Hixson LJ; Sampliner RE; Chernin M; Amberg J; Kogan F
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 2591391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.