150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100247)
1. Cumulative Cancer Locations is a Novel Metric for Predicting Active Surveillance Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.
Erickson AM; Luzzago S; Semjonow A; Vasarainen H; Laajala TD; Musi G; de Cobelli O; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):268-275. PubMed ID: 31100247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Tumor Regional Involvement on Active Surveillance Outcomes: Validation of the Cumulative Cancer Location Metric in a US Population.
Leong JY; Capella C; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Chandrasekar T
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 31109856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PTEN Loss but Not ERG Expression in Diagnostic Biopsies Is Associated with Increased Risk of Progression and Adverse Surgical Findings in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Lokman U; Erickson AM; Vasarainen H; Rannikko AS; Mirtti T
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Dec; 4(6):867-873. PubMed ID: 28753869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative cancer locations on prostate biopsy and active surveillance outcomes in the MRI era.
Fletcher SA; Mamawala MM; Holler AE; Bhanji Y; Macura KJ; de la Calle CM; Pavlovich CP
Prostate; 2024 Jun; 84(8):723-730. PubMed ID: 38476030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Cohort Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Colicchia M; Morlacco A; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Dal Moro F; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 29306730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Tomer A; Nieboer D; Roobol MJ; Bjartell A; Steyerberg EW; Rizopoulos D;
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 32531869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perera M; Jibara G; Tin AL; Haywood S; Sjoberg DD; Benfante NE; Carlsson SV; Eastham JA; Laudone V; Touijer KA; Fine S; Scardino PT; Vickers AJ; Ehdaie B
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):662-668. PubMed ID: 36566100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.
Reese AC; Cowan JE; Brajtbord JS; Harris CR; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Cancer; 2012 Dec; 118(24):6046-54. PubMed ID: 22674220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Multivariable Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Avoid a Protocol-based Prostate Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-Data from the International Multicenter Prospective PRIAS Study.
Luiting HB; Remmers S; Boevé ER; Valdagni R; Chiu PK; Semjonow A; Berge V; Tully KH; Rannikko AS; Staerman F; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35437217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.
Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Alibhai SM; Hamilton RJ; Toi A; van der Kwast TH; Evans A; Hersey K; Jewett MA; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE
Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):841-8. PubMed ID: 24954793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathological upgrading at radical prostatectomy for patients with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: implications of confirmatory testing for patients considering active surveillance.
Kaye DR; Qi J; Morgan TM; Linsell S; Ginsburg KB; Lane BR; Montie JE; Cher ML; Miller DC;
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 30248225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
