These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100247)

  • 1. Cumulative Cancer Locations is a Novel Metric for Predicting Active Surveillance Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.
    Erickson AM; Luzzago S; Semjonow A; Vasarainen H; Laajala TD; Musi G; de Cobelli O; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):268-275. PubMed ID: 31100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Tumor Regional Involvement on Active Surveillance Outcomes: Validation of the Cumulative Cancer Location Metric in a US Population.
    Leong JY; Capella C; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Chandrasekar T
    Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 31109856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PTEN Loss but Not ERG Expression in Diagnostic Biopsies Is Associated with Increased Risk of Progression and Adverse Surgical Findings in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
    Lokman U; Erickson AM; Vasarainen H; Rannikko AS; Mirtti T
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Dec; 4(6):867-873. PubMed ID: 28753869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
    Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cumulative cancer locations on prostate biopsy and active surveillance outcomes in the MRI era.
    Fletcher SA; Mamawala MM; Holler AE; Bhanji Y; Macura KJ; de la Calle CM; Pavlovich CP
    Prostate; 2024 Jun; 84(8):723-730. PubMed ID: 38476030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Cohort Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance.
    Colicchia M; Morlacco A; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Dal Moro F; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 29306730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
    Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
    Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Perera M; Jibara G; Tin AL; Haywood S; Sjoberg DD; Benfante NE; Carlsson SV; Eastham JA; Laudone V; Touijer KA; Fine S; Scardino PT; Vickers AJ; Ehdaie B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):662-668. PubMed ID: 36566100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.
    Tomer A; Nieboer D; Roobol MJ; Bjartell A; Steyerberg EW; Rizopoulos D;
    BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 32531869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.
    Reese AC; Cowan JE; Brajtbord JS; Harris CR; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
    Cancer; 2012 Dec; 118(24):6046-54. PubMed ID: 22674220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Multivariable Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Avoid a Protocol-based Prostate Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-Data from the International Multicenter Prospective PRIAS Study.
    Luiting HB; Remmers S; Boevé ER; Valdagni R; Chiu PK; Semjonow A; Berge V; Tully KH; Rannikko AS; Staerman F; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35437217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.
    Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Alibhai SM; Hamilton RJ; Toi A; van der Kwast TH; Evans A; Hersey K; Jewett MA; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE
    Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):841-8. PubMed ID: 24954793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathological upgrading at radical prostatectomy for patients with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: implications of confirmatory testing for patients considering active surveillance.
    Kaye DR; Qi J; Morgan TM; Linsell S; Ginsburg KB; Lane BR; Montie JE; Cher ML; Miller DC;
    BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 30248225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
    Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.