These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100247)

  • 21. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
    Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
    Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
    BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
    Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcomes of Active Surveillance after Initial Surveillance Prostate Biopsy.
    Kovac E; Lieser G; Elshafei A; Jones JS; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 27449260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.
    Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Manoharan M; Jorda M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 22445138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.
    Drost FH; Nieboer D; Morgan TM; Carroll PR; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 31451332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Downgrading of grade group 2 intermediate-risk prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Comparison of outcomes and predictors to identify potential candidates for active surveillance.
    Su ZT; Patel HD; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Allaf ME
    Cancer; 2020 Apr; 126(8):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 32031685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
    Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
    Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Cedars BE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Tenggara I; Chan JM; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 30958742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Factors Influencing Selection of Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Liu J; Womble PR; Merdan S; Miller DC; Montie JE; Denton BT;
    Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):901-5. PubMed ID: 26358397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Metastases and Prostate Cancer Death in Surgically Treated Men with Clinically Localized Disease.
    Van Den Eeden SK; Lu R; Zhang N; Quesenberry CP; Shan J; Han JS; Tsiatis AC; Leimpeter AD; Lawrence HJ; Febbo PG; Presti JC
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 28988753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).
    El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22726582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of Biopsy Compliance on Outcomes for Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Detsky JS; Ghiam AF; Mamedov A; Commisso K; Commisso A; Zhang L; Liu S; Klotz L; Loblaw A; Vesprini D
    J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):934-940. PubMed ID: 32330406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
    Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.
    Shah S; Beckmann K; Van Hemelrijck M; Challacombe B; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Elhage O; Santaolalla A
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):573. PubMed ID: 34011308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Five-year Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Large Cohort Study.
    Stavrinides V; Giganti F; Trock B; Punwani S; Allen C; Kirkham A; Freeman A; Haider A; Ball R; McCartan N; Whitaker H; Orczyk C; Emberton M; Moore CM
    Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 32360049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
    Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.