268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100332)
1. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 5-year clinical performance of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Loguercio AD; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Gutierrez MF; Gonzalez MI; Reis A; Heintze SD
Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 37839995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations.
Costa T; Rezende M; Sakamoto A; Bittencourt B; Dalzochio P; Loguercio AD; Reis A
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 27892839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Loguercio AD; Luque-Martinez IV; Fuentes S; Reis A; Muñoz MA
J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():60-69. PubMed ID: 28962842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of lesion size on the 30-month clinical performance of restorations with bulk fill and a regular nanofilled resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions.
Correia AMO; Jurema ALB; Bresciani E; Caneppele TMF
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3083-3093. PubMed ID: 36763143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
Barceleiro MO; Lopes LS; Tardem C; Calazans FS; Matos TP; Reis A; Calixto AL; Loguercio AD
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4337-4350. PubMed ID: 35142923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal Integrity of Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Class II Composite Restorations.
Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Bader D; El Gezawi M
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 26266653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of posterior restorations over wet and dry dentin using an etch-and-rinse adhesive: A 36-month randomized clinical trial.
González CC; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Dos Santos de Castro A; Mendez-Bauer L; Dávila-Sanchez A; Aliaga-Sancho P; Gutierrez MF; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Dent Mater; 2024 Apr; 40(4):619-628. PubMed ID: 38369403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.
de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Internal and marginal adaptation of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites in class II cavities placed with different adhesive strategies.
Haak R; Näke T; Park KJ; Ziebolz D; Krause F; Schneider H
Odontology; 2019 Jul; 107(3):374-382. PubMed ID: 30569286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of posterior high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite restorations in a high caries incidence population: interim results of a randomized clinical trial.
Durão MA; de Andrade AKM; do Prado AM; Veloso SRM; Maciel LMT; Montes MAJR; Monteiro GQM
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6219-6237. PubMed ID: 33821322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive - Results at 8 years.
Tian F; Mu H; Shi Y; Chen X; Zou X; Gao X; Wang X
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 38806383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentin moisture does not influence postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutiérrez MF; Martini EC; Dreweck FD; Mendez-Bauer L; Reis A; Loguercio AD
Am J Dent; 2020 Aug; 33(4):206-212. PubMed ID: 32794396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.
Yazici AR; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Karahan S; Antonson SA
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):417-426. PubMed ID: 34110494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Performance of a "No Wait" Universal Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Two-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Oz FD; Dursun MN; Ergin E
J Adhes Dent; 2022 Aug; 24(1):313-323. PubMed ID: 35980240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Oz FD; Ergin E; Canatan S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180358. PubMed ID: 30994773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
