These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100332)

  • 21. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
    Guney T; Yazici AR
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the "no-waiting" technique: a randomized clinical trial.
    de Almeida RAM; Lima SNL; Nassif MV; Mattos NHR; de Matos TP; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Cardenas AFM; Bandeca MC; Loguercio AD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):151-163. PubMed ID: 36068369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A New Dual-cure Universal Simplified Adhesive: 18-month Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.
    de Albuquerque EG; Warol F; Calazans FS; Poubel LA; Marins SS; Matos T; de Souza JJ; Reis A; de Oliveira Barceleiro M; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):E255-E270. PubMed ID: 33170938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schroeder M; Correa IC; Bauer J; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.
    Afifi SMH; Haridy MF; Farid MR
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Jul; 7(14):2335-2342. PubMed ID: 31592052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin.
    Pintado-Palomino K; de Almeida CVVB; da Motta RJG; Fortes JHP; Tirapelli C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 30218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Gurgan S
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Dec; 23(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 34817965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prolonged polymerization of a universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: 36-month double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Ñaupari-Villasante R; de Freitas A; Hass V; Matos TP; Parreiras SO; Reis A; Gutiérrez MF; Loguercio AD
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104823. PubMed ID: 38145806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance of bulk-fill versus conventional nanocomposite resin restorations supporting the occlusal rests of removable partial dentures: An in vitro investigation.
    Mesallum EE; Abd El Aziz PM; Swelem AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):907.e1-907.e7. PubMed ID: 37100650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of Dentin Moisture in Posterior Restorations Performed with Universal Adhesive: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Castro AS; Maran BM; Gutierrez MF; Chemin K; Mendez-Bauer ML; Bermúdez JP; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2022 Mar; 47(2):E91-E105. PubMed ID: 35405005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial.
    Carvalho AA; Leite MM; Zago JKM; Nunes CABCM; Barata TJE; Freitas GC; Torres ÉM; Lopes LG
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):252. PubMed ID: 31752813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.
    Al-Harbi F; Kaisarly D; Michna A; ArRejaie A; Bader D; El Gezawi M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):622-35. PubMed ID: 26151459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Correia A; Jurema A; Andrade MR; Borges A; Bresciani E; Caneppele T
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):E11-E20. PubMed ID: 31794342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized double-blind clinical trial.
    Loguercio AD; de Paula EA; Hass V; Luque-Martinez I; Reis A; Perdigão J
    J Dent; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1083-1092. PubMed ID: 26159382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Bittencourt DD; Baratieri LN; Reis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 138(4):507-14; quiz 535-7. PubMed ID: 17403742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive with additional enamel etching in Class III cavities.
    Ermis RB; Temel UB; Cellik EU; Kam O
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20420057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.