BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100340)

  • 1. The impact of stimulus modality on the processing of conflicting sensory information during response inhibition.
    Friedrich J; Beste C
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jul; 410():191-201. PubMed ID: 31100340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality.
    Bodmer B; Beste C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):1941-1951. PubMed ID: 28045223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated trimodal SSEP experimental setup for visual, auditory and tactile stimulation.
    Kuś R; Spustek T; Zieleniewska M; Duszyk A; Rogowski P; Suffczyński P
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Dec; 14(6):066002. PubMed ID: 28786397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses.
    Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decoding across sensory modalities reveals common supramodal signatures of conscious perception.
    Sanchez G; Hartmann T; Fuscà M; Demarchi G; Weisz N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(13):7437-7446. PubMed ID: 32184331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal distraction by deviance: functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):355-63. PubMed ID: 22750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus Feature Conflicts Enhance Motor Inhibitory Control Processes in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.
    Chmielewski WX; Beste C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 31(9):1430-1442. PubMed ID: 31059349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multisensory Neurons in the Primate Amygdala.
    Morrow J; Mosher C; Gothard K
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3663-3675. PubMed ID: 30858163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Existence of competing modality dominances.
    Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different visual and auditory latencies affect cross-modal non-spatial repetition inhibition.
    Wu X; Wang A; Tang X; Zhang M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102940. PubMed ID: 31665621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
    Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.
    Convento S; Wegner-Clemens KA; Yau JM
    Multisens Res; 2019 Jan; 32(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 31059492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.
    Lunghi C; Morrone MC; Alais D
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 24431437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and tactile frequency representations are co-embedded in modality-defined cortical sensory systems.
    Rahman MS; Barnes KA; Crommett LE; Tommerdahl M; Yau JM
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116837. PubMed ID: 32289461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.