These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100379)

  • 41. A catch-up validation study of an in vitro skin irritation test method using reconstructed human epidermis LabCyte EPI-MODEL24.
    Kojima H; Katoh M; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Suzuki T; Izumi R; Yamaguchi Y; Nakamura M; Kasahawa T; Shibai A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 34(7):766-74. PubMed ID: 24122860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A way forward of alternative methods in China: Implementation of skin corrosivity potential using in vitro reconstructed human epidermis.
    Liu Y; Li N; Chen L; Zhong L; Zhou M; Pan L; Chen D; Gu W; Li Y; Wang W; Guo Y; Cotovio J; Qiu J; Alépée N; Cai Z
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Oct; 52():321-331. PubMed ID: 30026125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of the human epidermis model SkinEthic RHE for in vitro skin corrosion testing of chemicals according to new OECD TG 431.
    Kandárová H; Liebsch M; Spielmann H; Genschow E; Schmidt E; Traue D; Guest R; Whittingham A; Warren N; Gamer AO; Remmele M; Kaufmann T; Wittmer E; De Wever B; Rosdy M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Aug; 20(5):547-59. PubMed ID: 16455230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Update on the validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative tests for skin corrosion and irritation.
    Fentem JH; Botham PA
    Altern Lab Anim; 2004 Jun; 32 Suppl 1B():683-8. PubMed ID: 23581159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Apparent limitations of OECD TG 431 for classification of acrylic- and methacrylic-based adhesives.
    Hoerst A; Hermann M; Mewes KR; Steinmeyer L; Buchholzer M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2024 Feb; 94():105700. PubMed ID: 37751785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro and human testing strategies for skin irritation.
    Robinson MK; Osborne R; Perkins MA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000; 919():192-204. PubMed ID: 11083109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS).
    Scheel J; Kleber M; Kreutz J; Lehringer E; Mehling A; Reisinger K; Steiling W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 21310206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two novel prediction models improve predictions of skin corrosive sub-categories by test methods of OECD Test Guideline No. 431.
    Desprez B; Barroso J; Griesinger C; Kandárová H; Alépée N; Fuchs HW
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Dec; 29(8):2055-80. PubMed ID: 26320836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. KeraSkin-VM: a novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests.
    Jung KM; Lee SH; Jang WH; Jung HS; Heo Y; Park YH; Bae S; Lim KM; Seok SH
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 24625437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A prevalidation study on the in vitro skin irritation function test (SIFT) for prediction of acute skin irritation in vivo: results and evaluation of ECVAM Phase III.
    Heylings JR; Diot S; Esdaile DJ; Fasano WJ; Manning LA; Owen HM
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2003 Apr; 17(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 12650665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation. results and evaluation by the Management Team.
    Fentem JH; Briggs D; Chesné C; Elliott GR; Harbell JW; Heylings JR; Portes P; Roguet R; van de Sandt JJ; Botham PA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Feb; 15(1):57-93. PubMed ID: 11259870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of the domestic Swine as an alternative animal model for conducting dermal irritation/corrosion studies on fatty amine ethoxylates.
    Rausch L; Bisinger EC; Sharma A; Rose R
    Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 12933326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Study on feasibility of HaCaT epidermal model as an alternative to skin irritation
    Liu Y; Lu T; Zhou Z; Lu Y; Zhang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1262-1266. PubMed ID: 29806332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: report on the validity of the EPISKIN and EpiDerm assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test.
    Spielmann H; Hoffmann S; Liebsch M; Botham P; Fentem JH; Eskes C; Roguet R; Cotovio J; Cole T; Worth A; Heylings J; Jones P; Robles C; Kandárová H; Gamer A; Remmele M; Curren R; Raabe H; Cockshott A; Gerner I; Zuang V
    Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Dec; 35(6):559-601. PubMed ID: 18186667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Short Time Exposure (STE) test in conjunction with Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay including histopathology to evaluate correspondence with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation classification of textile dyes.
    Oliveira GA; Ducas Rdo N; Teixeira GC; Batista AC; Oliveira DP; Valadares MC
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Sep; 29(6):1283-8. PubMed ID: 26026500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    Eberlin S; Facchini G; da Silva GH; Eberlin S; Bragatto AR; Pinheiro ALTA; da Silva Pinheiro A
    Altern Lab Anim; 2021 Jul; 49(4):137-146. PubMed ID: 34399588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Harmonization of thresholds for primary skin irritation from results of human repeated insult patch tests and laboratory animal skin irritation tests.
    Tardiff RG; Hubner RP; Graves CG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2003; 23(4):279-81. PubMed ID: 12884413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals.
    Hoffmann S; Saliner AG; Patlewicz G; Eskes C; Zuang V; Worth AP
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Jul; 180(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 18585875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The in vitro skin irritation of chemicals: optimisation of the EPISKIN prediction model within the framework of the ECVAM validation process.
    Cotovio J; Grandidier MH; Portes P; Roguet R; Rubinstenn G
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Aug; 33(4):329-49. PubMed ID: 16185103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.