425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31100484)
1. Midwives' perspectives of continuity based working in the UK: A cross-sectional survey.
Taylor B; Cross-Sudworth F; Goodwin L; Kenyon S; MacArthur C
Midwifery; 2019 Aug; 75():127-137. PubMed ID: 31100484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives' burnout levels and professional attitudes: A national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system.
Dawson K; Newton M; Forster D; McLachlan H
Midwifery; 2018 Aug; 63():60-67. PubMed ID: 29803988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Team midwifery: the views and job satisfaction of midwives.
Todd CJ; Farquhar MC; Camilleri-Ferrante C
Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 10076316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Midwives' experiences of father participation in maternity care at a large metropolitan health service in Australia.
Wynter K; Di Manno L; Watkins V; Rasmussen B; Macdonald JA
Midwifery; 2021 Oct; 101():103046. PubMed ID: 34098224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The key components of a successful model of midwifery-led continuity of carer, without continuity at birth: findings from a qualitative implementation evaluation.
Dharni N; Essex H; Bryant MJ; Cronin de Chavez A; Willan K; Farrar D; Bywater T; Dickerson J;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 33711957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrapartum Care Working Patterns of Midwives: The Long Road to Models of Care in Germany.
Gross MM; Michelsen C; Vaske B; Helbig S
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2018 Apr; 222(2):72-81. PubMed ID: 29341048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' views of caseload midwifery - comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives' opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives.
Newton M; Dawson K; Forster D; McLachlan H
Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):e47-e56. PubMed ID: 32653395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The motivation and capacity to go 'above and beyond': Qualitative analysis of free-text survey responses in the M@NGO randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery.
Allen J; Kildea S; Hartz DL; Tracy M; Tracy S
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():148-156. PubMed ID: 28458123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A qualitative study of how caseload midwifery is constituted and experienced by Danish midwives.
Jepsen I; Mark E; Nøhr EA; Foureur M; Sørensen EE
Midwifery; 2016 May; 36():61-9. PubMed ID: 27106945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflections on an educational intervention to encourage midwives to work in a continuity of care model - exploration and potential solutions.
Harris JM; Watts K; Page L; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102733. PubMed ID: 32474300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midwives' experiences of referring obese women to either a community or home-based antenatal weight management service: Implications for service providers and midwifery practice.
Atkinson L; French DP; Ménage D; Olander EK
Midwifery; 2017 Jun; 49():102-109. PubMed ID: 27817977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midwives' views of changing to a Continuity of Midwifery Care (CMC) model in Scotland: A baseline survey.
Hollins Martin CJ; MacArthur J; Martin CR; McInnes RJ
Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e409-e419. PubMed ID: 31780253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how.
Rayment-Jones H; Silverio SA; Harris J; Harden A; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2020 May; 84():102654. PubMed ID: 32066030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Midwives' perceptions of their role within the context of maternity service reform: An Appreciative Inquiry.
Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Rath S; Gamble J
Women Birth; 2015 Jun; 28(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 25582894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. `It makes sense and it works': Maternity care providers' perspectives on the feasibility of a group antenatal care model (Pregnancy Circles).
Hunter L; Da Motta G; McCourt C; Wiseman O; Rayment J; Haora P; Wiggins M; Harden A
Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():56-63. PubMed ID: 30125782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing mental health during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study of midwives' perceptions.
Baker N; Gillman L; Coxon K
Midwifery; 2020 Jul; 86():102690. PubMed ID: 32276157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working in caseload midwifery care: the experience of midwives working in a birth centre in North Queensland.
Edmondson MC; Walker SB
Women Birth; 2014 Mar; 27(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 24148158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using a quality care framework to evaluate user and provider experiences of maternity care: A comparative study.
Symon A; McFadden A; White M; Fraser K; Cummins A
Midwifery; 2019 Jun; 73():17-25. PubMed ID: 30856527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
