BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31101545)

  • 1. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 years follow-up from the COMPARE II trial.
    Paradies V; Vlachojannis GJ; Royaards KJ; Wassing J; van der Ent M; Smits PC
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 290():40-44. PubMed ID: 31101545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) randomised trials.
    Vlachojannis GJ; Puricel S; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Smits PC; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Mar; 12(16):1970-1977. PubMed ID: 27802927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: three-year follow-up of the COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) trial.
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Puricel S; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Jul; 11(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 26196753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 26446596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.
    Serruys PW; Farooq V; Kalesan B; de Vries T; Buszman P; Linke A; Ischinger T; Klauss V; Eberli F; Wijns W; Morice MC; Di Mario C; Corti R; Antoni D; Sohn HY; Eerdmans P; Rademaker-Havinga T; van Es GA; Meier B; Jüni P; Windecker S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):777-89. PubMed ID: 23968698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical outcomes of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stents versus biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the KAMIR.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Feb; 34(2):237-250. PubMed ID: 30167772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Lee HJ; Park TK; Song YB; Choi YJ; Yu CW; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi RK; Choi JH; Park JS; Kim JS; Kim TH; Jang HJ; Lee SH; Shim WH; Roh YM; Gwon HC
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 183():190-7. PubMed ID: 25668147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary bifurcations.
    Costopoulos C; Latib A; Naganuma T; Sticchi A; Ferrarello S; Regazzoli D; Chieffo A; Figini F; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Naim C; Kawaguchi M; Gerasimou A; Giannini F; Godino C; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):889-95. PubMed ID: 23804318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymers in Unselected Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up (SORT OUT VIII Trial).
    Maeng M; Christiansen EH; Raungaard B; Kahlert J; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Carstensen S; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Villadsen AB; Lassen JF; Thim T; Eftekhari A; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Junker A; Bøtker HE; Jensen LO;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):624-633. PubMed ID: 30947936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
    Smits PC; Hofma S; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; Vuillomenet A; Serra A; Nouche RT; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    Lancet; 2013 Feb; 381(9867):651-60. PubMed ID: 23374650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.
    Lee DH; Park TK; Song YB; Chun WJ; Choi RK; Jeong JO; Im ES; Kim SW; Lee JM; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Gwon HC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183079. PubMed ID: 28797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and efficacy profile of bioresorbable-polylactide-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents versus durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    Jaguszewski M; Dörig M; Frangieh AH; Ghadri JR; Cammann VL; Diekmann J; Napp LC; D'Ascenzo F; Imori Y; Obeid S; Maier W; Lüscher TF; Templin C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):E173-E182. PubMed ID: 27377554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Moarof I; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Stortecky S; Losdat S; Eeckhout E; Valgimigli M; Odutayo A; Zwahlen M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Lancet; 2019 Oct; 394(10205):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 31488372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting and Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT VI Trial.
    Raungaard B; Christiansen EH; Bøtker HE; Hansen HS; Ravkilde J; Thuesen L; Aarøe J; Villadsen AB; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Maeng M; Kristensen SD; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Junker A; Madsen M; Andersen SL; Jensen SE; Jensen LO;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 10(3):255-264. PubMed ID: 28109874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.
    Gao RL; Xu B; Lansky AJ; Yang YJ; Ma CS; Han YL; Chen SL; Li H; Zhang RY; Fu GS; Yuan ZY; Jiang H; Huo Y; Li W; Zhang YJ; Leon MB;
    EuroIntervention; 2013 May; 9(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 23685298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 62(3):181-190. PubMed ID: 23684673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.
    von Birgelen C; Kok MM; van der Heijden LC; Danse PW; Schotborgh CE; Scholte M; Gin RMTJ; Somi S; van Houwelingen KG; Stoel MG; de Man FHAF; Louwerenburg JHW; Hartmann M; Zocca P; Linssen GCM; van der Palen J; Doggen CJM; Löwik MM
    Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2607-2617. PubMed ID: 27806902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.