259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31101963)
21. [Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic strategies].
Ewald C; Kalff R
Nervenarzt; 2011 Dec; 82(12):1623-29; quiz 1630-1. PubMed ID: 22108811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Lateral fenestration combined with spinal canal decompression through contralateral laminotomy for radiculopathy caused by lumbar canal stenosis and lumbar foraminal stenosis: a case report].
Sasaki M; Aoki M; Yoshimine T
No Shinkei Geka; 2010 May; 38(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 20522920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel MRI classification system for congenital functional lumbar spinal stenosis predicts the risk for tandem cervical spinal stenosis.
van Eck CF; Spina Iii NT; Lee JY
Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 27323965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management.
Issack PS; Cunningham ME; Pumberger M; Hughes AP; Cammisa FP
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2012 Aug; 20(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 22855855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Chimney sublaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lin SM; Tseng SH; Yang JC; Tu CC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 May; 4(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 16703902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of minimally invasive decompression surgery on quality of life in older patients with spinal stenosis.
Dagistan Y; Dagistan E; Gezici AR; Cancan SE; Bilgi M; Cakir U
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Dec; 139():86-90. PubMed ID: 26397214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Osteochondral loose body: an unusual cause of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Treon K; Ockendon M
Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(Suppl 1):167-169. PubMed ID: 28185063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Bilateral Lumbar Decompression of Spinal Stenosis Through Uniportal-Contralateral Approach: Techniques and Preliminary Results.
Kim HS; Paudel B; Jang JS; Oh SH; Lee S; Park JE; Jang IT
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():201-209. PubMed ID: 28389410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis across the Atlantic: a comparison of preoperative MRI between matched cohorts from the US and Norway.
Bhalla A; Cha TD; Weber C; Nerland U; Gulati S; Lønne G
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Mar; 160(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 29350291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Sato K; Kikuchi S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Aug; 22(16):1898-903; discussion 1904. PubMed ID: 9280027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing surgical levels by paraspinal mapping and diffusion tensor imaging techniques in lumbar spinal stenosis.
Chen HB; Wan Q; Xu QF; Chen Y; Bai B
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 11(1):47. PubMed ID: 27113931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Lumbar spinal stenosis. Classification and clinical presentation].
van Akkerveeken PF
Orthopade; 1993 Aug; 22(4):202-10. PubMed ID: 8414475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.
Barz C; Melloh M; Staub LP; Lord SJ; Merk HR; Barz T
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2573-2580. PubMed ID: 28161752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Lumbar spinal stenosis].
Galanski M; Weidner A; Vogelsang H
Rontgenblatter; 1982 Dec; 35(12):450-8. PubMed ID: 7178770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Simultaneous cervical and lumbar surgery for combined symptomatic cervical and lumbar spinal stenoses.
Naderi S; Mertol T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2002 Jun; 15(3):229-31; discussion 231-2. PubMed ID: 12131425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
