BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31102138)

  • 1. Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.
    Fukuda K; Mori K; Hasegawa N; Nasu K; Ishige K; Okamoto Y; Shiigai M; Abei M; Minami M; Hyodo I
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):555-563. PubMed ID: 31102138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging evaluation of ablative margin and index tumor immediately after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between multidetector-row CT and MR imaging.
    Kim SM; Shin SS; Lee BC; Kim JW; Heo SH; Lim HS; Jeong YY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2527-2537. PubMed ID: 28409202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of Nonrigid Registration of Pre-Procedure MR with Post-Procedure CT After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park J; Lee JM; Lee DH; Joo I; Yoon JH; Park JY; Klotz E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):873-883. PubMed ID: 28091728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ablative margin states by magnetic resonance imaging with ferucarbotran in radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma can predict local tumor progression.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):1283-92. PubMed ID: 23338488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Assessment of Ablative Margin Using Pre-RFA MRI and Post-RFA CT Registration.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Klotz E; Woo H; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 30386137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images.
    Takeyama N; Mizobuchi N; Sakaki M; Shimozuma Y; Munechika J; Kajiwara A; Uchikoshi M; Uozumi S; Ohgiya Y; Gokan T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):923-935. PubMed ID: 30327828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of ablative margin by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Okamoto K; Murawaki Y; Kakite S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2730-6. PubMed ID: 22137612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical usefulness of the ablative margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Okamoto T; Hodozuka M; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Oyama K; Hosho K; Okano J; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 63(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 26232269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D fusion is superior to 2D point-to-point contrast-enhanced US to evaluate the ablative margin after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Long H; Zhou X; Zhang X; Ye J; Huang T; Cong L; Xie X; Huang G
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 37572191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of ablative margin by MRI with ferucarbotran in radiofrequency ablation for liver cancer: comparison with enhanced CT.
    Tokunaga S; Koda M; Matono T; Sugihara T; Nagahara T; Ueki M; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 85(1014):745-52. PubMed ID: 21385915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of ablative margin after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma; comparison between magnetic resonance imaging with ferucarbotran and enhanced CT with iodized oil deposition.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Nagahara T; Ueki M; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1400-4. PubMed ID: 21440397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging predicts local tumor progression by evaluating ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report.
    Ye J; Huang G; Zhang X; Xu M; Zhou X; Lin M; Xie X; Xie X
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2019; 36(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 30444428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion.
    Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: precise assessment with a three-dimensional reconstruction technique using CT imaging.
    Jiang C; Liu B; Chen S; Peng Z; Xie X; Kuang M
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2018 Dec; 34(8):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 29392978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Makino Y; Imai Y; Igura T; Hori M; Fukuda K; Sawai Y; Kogita S; Fujita N; Takehara T; Murakami T
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.
    Lee DH; Lee MW; Kim PN; Lee YJ; Park HS; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2021 Oct; 301(1):229-236. PubMed ID: 34313474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of radiofrequency ablation margin by MRI-MRI image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Wang XL; Li K; Su ZZ; Huang ZP; Wang P; Zheng RQ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(17):5345-51. PubMed ID: 25954109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Efficacy and Therapeutic Outcome of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Real-World Setting, Compared with Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Conducted during the Same Period.
    Tanaka T; Takata K; Kunimoto H; Fukuda H; Yamauchi R; Tsuchiya N; Inomata S; Yokoyama K; Morihara D; Takeyama Y; Shakado S; Sakisaka S; Hirai F
    Oncology; 2020; 98(12):859-868. PubMed ID: 32799203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3-D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Fusion Imaging: A New Technique to Evaluate the Ablative Margin of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Huang G; Ye J; Xu M; Cong L; He X; Huang T; Kuang M; Xie X
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1933-1943. PubMed ID: 31109841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronal reformatted CT images contribute to the precise evaluation of the radiofrequency ablative margin for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Motoyama T; Ogasawara S; Chiba T; Higashide T; Yokota H; Kanogawa N; Suzuki E; Ooka Y; Tawada A; Irie R; Ochi S; Masuda Y; Uno T; Yokosuka O
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Apr; 39(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 24346490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.