BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

577 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31102462)

  • 1. Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.
    Ghazi P; Hernandez AM; Abbey C; Yang K; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3414-3430. PubMed ID: 31102462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT.
    Pautasso JJ; Caballo M; Mikerov M; Boone JM; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2022-2036. PubMed ID: 36565012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Segmentation-free empirical beam hardening correction for CT.
    Schüller S; Sawall S; Stannigel K; Hülsbusch M; Ulrici J; Hell E; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):794-803. PubMed ID: 25652493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Projection-domain scatter correction for cone beam computed tomography using a residual convolutional neural network.
    Nomura Y; Xu Q; Shirato H; Shimizu S; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3142-3155. PubMed ID: 31077390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model-based scatter artifacts correction for cone beam CT.
    Zhao W; Vernekohl D; Zhu J; Wang L; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1736. PubMed ID: 27036571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images.
    Niu T; Sun M; Star-Lack J; Gao H; Fan Q; Zhu L
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5395-406. PubMed ID: 21089775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A breast-specific, negligible-dose scatter correction technique for dedicated cone-beam breast CT: a physics-based approach to improve Hounsfield Unit accuracy.
    Yang K; Burkett G; Boone JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6487-505. PubMed ID: 25310586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration-free beam hardening correction for myocardial perfusion imaging using CT.
    Levi J; Eck BL; Fahmi R; Wu H; Vembar M; Dhanantwari A; Fares A; Bezerra HG; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1648-1662. PubMed ID: 30689216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shading correction assisted iterative cone-beam CT reconstruction.
    Yang C; Wu P; Gong S; Wang J; Lyu Q; Tang X; Niu T
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(22):8495-8520. PubMed ID: 29077573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image-domain shading correction for cone-beam CT without prior patient information.
    Fan Q; Lu B; Park JC; Niu T; Li JG; Liu C; Zhu L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):65-75. PubMed ID: 26699555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An unsupervised automatic segmentation algorithm for breast tissue classification of dedicated breast computed tomography images.
    Caballo M; Boone JM; Mann R; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2542-2559. PubMed ID: 29676025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical beam hardening correction (EBHC) for CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Meyer E; Prell D; Kachelriess M
    Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5179-87. PubMed ID: 21089751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical scatter correction: CBCT scatter artifact reduction without prior information.
    Trapp P; Maier J; Susenburger M; Sawall S; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4566-4584. PubMed ID: 35390181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.
    Qu X; Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1233-46. PubMed ID: 26514684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sinogram domain metal artifact correction of CT via deep learning.
    Zhu Y; Zhao H; Wang T; Deng L; Yang Y; Jiang Y; Li N; Chan Y; Dai J; Zhang C; Li Y; Xie Y; Liang X
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Mar; 155():106710. PubMed ID: 36842222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep convolutional-neural-network-based metal artifact reduction for CT-guided interventional oncology procedures (MARIO).
    Cao W; Parvinian A; Adamo D; Welch B; Callstrom M; Ren L; Missert A; Favazza CP
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4231-4242. PubMed ID: 38353644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iterative CT shading correction with no prior information.
    Wu P; Sun X; Hu H; Mao T; Zhao W; Sheng K; Cheung AA; Niu T
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8437-55. PubMed ID: 26464343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative performance assessment of beam hardening correction algorithms applied on simulated data sets.
    Cao W; Sun T; Fardell G; Price B; Dewulf W
    J Microsc; 2018 Dec; 272(3):229-241. PubMed ID: 30088275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.