218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31102622)
1. Patient Experience of Systematic Versus Fusion Prostate Biopsies.
Eineluoto JT; Järvinen P; Kilpeläinen T; Lahdensuo K; Kalalahti I; Sandeman K; Mirtti T; Rannikko A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):202-207. PubMed ID: 31102622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator 2.0 performs equally for standard biopsy and MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.
Maruf M; Fascelli M; George AK; Siddiqui MM; Kongnyuy M; DiBianco JM; Muthigi A; Valayil S; Sidana A; Frye TP; Kilchevsky A; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 28220802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.
Sidana A; Watson MJ; George AK; Rastinehad AR; Vourganti S; Rais-Bahrami S; Muthigi A; Maruf M; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7. PubMed ID: 29753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Discomfort and Pain in Patients Undergoing Fusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided vs TRUS-guided Prostate Biopsy.
Robins D; Lipsky M; RoyChoudry A; Wenske S
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():30-34. PubMed ID: 29545039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.
Calio B; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Jain A; Maruf M; Xu S; Yan P; Kruecker J; Merino M; Choyke P; Turkbey B; Wood B; Pinto P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Dec; 20(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 28762373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.
Kongnyuy M; Siddiqui MM; George AK; Muthigi A; Sidana A; Maruf M; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Sep; 20(3):348-351. PubMed ID: 28440325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy.
Kasabwala K; Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Shimpi AA; Weng S; Buchmann RM; Motanagh S; Wu Y; Banerjee S; Khani F; Margolis DJ; Robinson BD; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 2(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 31017088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between Template Systematic Biopsies Obtained Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Machine and Freehand Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsies.
Hoge C; Maynor S; Guan T; Naffouje R; Rao M; Verma S; Sidana A
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 32631097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification.
Muthigi A; Sidana A; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Shakir N; Kadakia M; Maruf M; Frye TP; Mertan F; Su D; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Sep; 48(9):1445-52. PubMed ID: 27305918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer rates in patients with initially negative elastography-targeted biopsy vs. systematic biopsy.
Kratzenberg J; Salomon G; Tennstedt P; Dell'Oglio P; Tilki D; Haferkamp A; Graefen M; Boehm K
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):623-628. PubMed ID: 29332260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of procedural anxiety and pain associated with conventional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: a prospective cohort trial.
Deivasigamani S; Adams ES; Kotamarti S; Mottaghi M; Taha T; Aminsharifi A; Michael Z; Seguier D; Polascik TJ
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 38001362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications and Adverse Events of Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Target Biopsy Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Among Men with Prior Negative Biopsies: Results from the FUTURE Trial, a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kelder JC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):617-624. PubMed ID: 31519516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PTEN and ERG expression in MRI-ultrasound guided fusion biopsy correlated with radical prostatectomy findings in men with prostate cancer.
Erickson AM; Lokman U; Lahdensuo K; Tornberg S; Visapaa H; Bergroth R; Santti H; Petas A; Rannikko AS; Mirtti T
Prostate; 2020 Sep; 80(13):1118-1127. PubMed ID: 32634262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients.
Marra G; Zhuang J; Marquis A; Zhao X; Calleris G; Kan Y; Oderda M; Huang H; Faletti R; Zhang Q; Molinaro L; Wang W; Bergamasco L; Guo H; Gontero P
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1209-1215. PubMed ID: 32628099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
