These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31102856)

  • 1. Efficient phosphorus removal from MBR effluent with heated aluminum oxide particles (HAOPs).
    Lee G; Modarresi S; Benjamin MM
    Water Res; 2019 Aug; 159():274-282. PubMed ID: 31102856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of water chemistry and operational conditions on μGAF process performance.
    Liu J; Benjamin MM
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():76-84. PubMed ID: 27598697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NOM removal by adsorption and membrane filtration using heated aluminum oxide particles.
    Cai Z; Kim J; Benjamin MM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 18284172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous removal of phosphorus and foulants in a hybrid coagulation/membrane filtration system.
    Kim J; Deng Q; Benjamin MM
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2017-24. PubMed ID: 18222523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of a Novel Adsorbent on Membrane Fouling by Natural Organic Matter in Drinking Water Treatment.
    Manamperuma LD; Vik EA; Benjamin M; Cai Z; Skjefstad J
    Membranes (Basel); 2019 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 31726682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-spectral approach to differentiate the effects of adsorbent pretreatments on the characteristics of NOM and membrane fouling.
    Wang LF; Benjamin MM
    Water Res; 2016 Jul; 98():56-63. PubMed ID: 27082692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced phosphorus removal from membrane filtrates by adsorption on activated aluminium oxide and granulated ferric hydroxide.
    Genz A; Kornmüller A; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2004 Sep; 38(16):3523-30. PubMed ID: 15325178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hanced biological phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors.
    Adam C; Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Buisson H; Krauma M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):281-6. PubMed ID: 12361022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced membrane bioreactor process without chemical cleaning.
    Krause S; Zimmermann B; Meyer-Blumenroth U; Lamparter W; Siembida B; Cornel P
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2575-80. PubMed ID: 20453330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NOM fractionation and fouling of low-pressure membranes in microgranular adsorptive filtration.
    Cai Z; Benjamin MM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):8935-40. PubMed ID: 21905711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced nutrient removal MBR system with chemical addition for low effluent TP.
    Liu WJ; Hu ZR; Walker RL; Dold PL
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(6):1298-306. PubMed ID: 22214084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.
    Galil NI; Sheindorf Ch; Stahl N; Tenenbaum A; Levinsky Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):103-10. PubMed ID: 14682576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating organic micropollutant removal into tertiary filtration: Combining PAC adsorption with advanced phosphorus removal.
    Altmann J; Sperlich A; Jekel M
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 84():58-65. PubMed ID: 26210030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of human adenovirus removal in a full-scale membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
    Kuo DH; Simmons FJ; Blair S; Hart E; Rose JB; Xagoraraki I
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1520-30. PubMed ID: 19944439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of a membrane bioreactor system for opto-electronic industrial wastewater treatment--a pilot study.
    Chen TK; Chen JN; Ni CH; Lin GT; Chang CY
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):195-202. PubMed ID: 14682587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance investigation of membrane bioreactor systems during municipal wastewater reclamation.
    DeCarolis JF; Adham S
    Water Environ Res; 2007 Dec; 79(13):2536-50. PubMed ID: 18198699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process.
    Lee H; Han J; Yun Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent.
    Bonvin F; Jost L; Randin L; Bonvin E; Kohn T
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():90-99. PubMed ID: 26724443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.