BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31103132)

  • 1. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Polymer-Free Biolimus-Eluting Stent and Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent in All-Comer Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Pepe M; Biondi-Zoccai G; Corcione N; Nestola PL; Ferraro P; Morello A; Conte S; Prati F; Bianchi FP; Bortone AS; Giordano A
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Jul; 124(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 31103132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year clinical outcomes of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting durable-polymer-coated stents versus biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer-coated stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction with dyslipidemia after percutaneous coronary intervention: data from the KAMIR.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Feb; 34(2):237-250. PubMed ID: 30167772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 26446596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Lee HJ; Park TK; Song YB; Choi YJ; Yu CW; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi RK; Choi JH; Park JS; Kim JS; Kim TH; Jang HJ; Lee SH; Shim WH; Roh YM; Gwon HC
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 183():190-7. PubMed ID: 25668147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.
    Lee DH; Park TK; Song YB; Chun WJ; Choi RK; Jeong JO; Im ES; Kim SW; Lee JM; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Gwon HC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183079. PubMed ID: 28797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and efficacy profile of bioresorbable-polylactide-polymer-biolimus-A9-eluting stents versus durable-polymer-everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    Jaguszewski M; Dörig M; Frangieh AH; Ghadri JR; Cammann VL; Diekmann J; Napp LC; D'Ascenzo F; Imori Y; Obeid S; Maier W; Lüscher TF; Templin C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):E173-E182. PubMed ID: 27377554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biolimus-eluting versus everolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis from the NEXT (NOBORI biolimus-eluting versus XIENCE/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent) and COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) randomised trials.
    Vlachojannis GJ; Puricel S; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Smits PC; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Mar; 12(16):1970-1977. PubMed ID: 27802927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary bifurcations.
    Costopoulos C; Latib A; Naganuma T; Sticchi A; Ferrarello S; Regazzoli D; Chieffo A; Figini F; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Naim C; Kawaguchi M; Gerasimou A; Giannini F; Godino C; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):889-95. PubMed ID: 23804318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: propensity score-matched analysis.
    Lee JH; Lee JW; Youn YJ; Ahn MS; Ahn SG; Kim JY; Yoo BS; Lee SH; Choi E; Yoon J
    J Interv Cardiol; 2014 Aug; 27(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 25052960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 1-Month and 12-Month Vessel Responses Between the Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stent and the Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Ishihara T; Mizote I; Nakamura D; Okamoto N; Shiraki T; Itaya N; Tsujimura T; Takahara M; Nakayoshi T; Iida O; Hata Y; Nishino M; Ueno T; Nakatani D; Hikoso S; Nanto S; Mano T; Sakata Y;
    Circ J; 2022 Aug; 86(9):1397-1408. PubMed ID: 35660701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of current smoking on 2-year clinical outcomes between durable-polymer-coated stents and biodegradable-polymer-coated stents in acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention: Data from the KAMIR.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205046. PubMed ID: 30289945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents at One-Year Follow-Up: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.
    Parsa E; Saroukhani S; Majlessi F; Poorhosseini H; Lofti-Tokaldany M; Jalali A; Salarifar M; Nematipour E; Alidoosti M; Aghajani H; Amirzadegan A; Kassaian SE
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2016 Apr; 43(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 27127426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice.
    Zanchin C; Ueki Y; Zanchin T; Häner J; Otsuka T; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Siontis GCM; Praz F; Moschovitis A; Hunziker L; Valgimigli M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 31422088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 years follow-up from the COMPARE II trial.
    Paradies V; Vlachojannis GJ; Royaards KJ; Wassing J; van der Ent M; Smits PC
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 290():40-44. PubMed ID: 31101545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus- -eluting stent versus durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in the diabetic population.
    Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Roleder M; Hawranek M; Wojakowski W; Polonski L
    Cardiol J; 2021; 28(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 31909473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymers in Unselected Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up (SORT OUT VIII Trial).
    Maeng M; Christiansen EH; Raungaard B; Kahlert J; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Carstensen S; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Villadsen AB; Lassen JF; Thim T; Eftekhari A; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Junker A; Bøtker HE; Jensen LO;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):624-633. PubMed ID: 30947936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Sakurai R; Burazor I; Bonneau HN; Kaneda H
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 223():1066-1071. PubMed ID: 27634137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.