These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31103878)

  • 1. Exploring causes and effects of automated vehicle disengagement using statistical modeling and classification tree based on field test data.
    Wang S; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():44-54. PubMed ID: 31103878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the who, what, when, where, and why of automated vehicle disengagements.
    Boggs AM; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105406. PubMed ID: 31887460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the mechanism of crashes with automated vehicles using statistical modeling approaches.
    Wang S; Li Z
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214550. PubMed ID: 30921396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autonomous vehicles' disengagements: Trends, triggers, and regulatory limitations.
    Favarò F; Eurich S; Nader N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():136-148. PubMed ID: 29136558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Autonomous Vehicles: Disengagements, Accidents and Reaction Times.
    Dixit VV; Chand S; Nair DJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168054. PubMed ID: 27997566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who is performing the driving tasks after interventions? Investigating drivers' understanding of mode transition logic in automated vehicles.
    Kim S; Novakazi F; van Grondelle E; van Egmond R; Happee R
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Nov; 121():104369. PubMed ID: 39182395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1961-1976. PubMed ID: 37490722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers' Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Alsaid A; Lee JD; Price M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 31180728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style.
    Lee Y; Dong M; Krishnamoorthy V; Akash K; Misu T; Zheng Z; Huang G
    Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2166-2178. PubMed ID: 37295016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of assignments of dedicated automated vehicle lanes and inter-vehicle distances of automated vehicle platoons on car-following performance of nearby manual vehicle drivers.
    Chen F; Lu G; Tan H; Liu M; Wan H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Nov; 177():106826. PubMed ID: 36081223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated vehicles and older drivers in Canada.
    Robertson RD; Woods-Fry H; Vanlaar WGM; Mainegra Hing M
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():193-199. PubMed ID: 31847995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.
    Vogelpohl T; Kühn M; Hummel T; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():70-84. PubMed ID: 29571975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.