These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31103878)

  • 21. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Getting Back Into the Loop: The Perceptual-Motor Determinants of Successful Transitions out of Automated Driving.
    Mole CD; Lappi O; Giles O; Markkula G; Mars F; Wilkie RM
    Hum Factors; 2019 Nov; 61(7):1037-1065. PubMed ID: 30840514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fleet analysis of headway distance for autonomous driving.
    Ivanco A
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():145-148. PubMed ID: 29203012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.
    Teoh ER; Kidd DG
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():57-60. PubMed ID: 29203024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of Automation on Drivers' Performance in Agricultural Semi-Autonomous Vehicles.
    Bashiri B; Mann DD
    J Agric Saf Health; 2015 Apr; 21(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 26204788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads.
    Pipkorn L; Dozza M; Tivesten E
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses.
    Morando A; Victor T; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():206-219. PubMed ID: 27658227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour.
    Merriman SE; Revell KMA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Oct; 112():104057. PubMed ID: 37285640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evidence of automated vehicle safety's influence on people's acceptance of the automated driving technology.
    Wang S; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhao W; Liu T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107381. PubMed ID: 37980839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Projecting the planned trajectory of a Level-2 automated vehicle in the windshield: Effects on human drivers' take-over response to silent failures.
    Jung KH; Labriola JT; Baek H
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():104047. PubMed ID: 37207522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluate driver response to active warning system in level-2 automated vehicles.
    Atwood JR; Guo F; Blanco M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():132-138. PubMed ID: 31005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expert Drivers' Prospective Thinking-Aloud to Enhance Automated Driving Technologies - Investigating Uncertainty and Anticipation in Traffic.
    Grahn H; Kujala T; Silvennoinen J; Leppänen A; Saariluoma P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105717. PubMed ID: 32798781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the impact of on-road partially-automated driving on drivers' cognitive workload and attention allocation.
    Biondi FN; Jajo N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107537. PubMed ID: 38471237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of highly automated driving on the self-perception of drivers in the context of Conduct-by-Wire.
    Kauer M; Franz B; Maier A; Bruder R
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(2):321-34. PubMed ID: 25343710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.