These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31104177)

  • 1. Ventricular geometry-regularized QRSd predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy response: machine learning from crosstalk between electrocardiography and echocardiography.
    Lei J; Wang YG; Bhatta L; Ahmed J; Fan D; Wang J; Liu K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 31104177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.
    Feeny AK; Rickard J; Trulock KM; Patel D; Toro S; Moennich LA; Varma N; Niebauer MJ; Gorodeski EZ; Grimm RA; Barnard J; Madabhushi A; Chung MK
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Jul; 13(7):e008210. PubMed ID: 32538136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB.
    Varma N; Manne M; Nguyen D; He J; Niebauer M; Tchou P
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jul; 11(7):1139-47. PubMed ID: 24704570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QRS frequency characteristics help predict response to cardiac resynchronization in left bundle branch block less than 150 milliseconds.
    Niebauer MJ; Rickard J; Polakof L; Tchou PJ; Varma N
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Dec; 11(12):2183-9. PubMed ID: 25068573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size Matters: Normalization of QRS Duration to Left Ventricular Dimension Improves Prediction of Long-Term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcome.
    Zweerink A; Friedman DJ; Klem I; van de Ven PM; Vink C; Biesbroek PS; Hansen SM; Emerek K; Kim RJ; van Rossum AC; Atwater BD; Nijveldt R; Allaart CP
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e006767. PubMed ID: 30541355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Effect of Left Ventricular Size and QRS Duration in Left Bundle Branch Block.
    Varma N; Lappe J; He J; Niebauer M; Manne M; Tchou P
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 3(8):844-853. PubMed ID: 29759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heart Size Difference Drives Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MORE-MPP CRT Trial.
    Wijesuriya N; Mehta V; De Vere F; Howell S; Niederer SA; Burri H; Sperzel J; Calo L; Thibault B; Lin W; Lee K; Grammatico A; Varma N; Gwechenberger M; Leclercq C; Rinaldi CA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Jun; 13(12):e035279. PubMed ID: 38879456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Engels EB; Végh EM; Van Deursen CJ; Vernooy K; Singh JP; Prinzen FW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 25230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction of Left Ventricular Size and Sex on Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With a Narrow QRS Duration in the EchoCRT Trial.
    Varma N; Sogaard P; Bax JJ; Abraham WT; Borer JS; Dickstein K; Singh JP; Gras D; Holzmeister J; Brugada J; Ruschitzka F
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 May; 7(11):. PubMed ID: 29807890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy by normalization of QRS duration to left ventricular dimension.
    Zweerink A; Wu L; de Roest GJ; Nijveldt R; de Cock CC; van Rossum AC; Allaart CP
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1508-1513. PubMed ID: 27707784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical utility of QRS duration normalized to left ventricular volume for predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy in patients with "mid-range" QRS duration.
    Yamamoto N; Noda T; Nakano M; Ito T; Sato H; Hayashi H; Chiba T; Hasebe Y; Ueda N; Kamakura T; Ishibashi K; Miyata S; Kusano K; Yasuda S
    Heart Rhythm; 2024 Jun; 21(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 38367890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines.
    Feeny AK; Rickard J; Patel D; Toro S; Trulock KM; Park CJ; LaBarbera MA; Varma N; Niebauer MJ; Sinha S; Gorodeski EZ; Grimm RA; Ji X; Barnard J; Madabhushi A; Spragg DD; Chung MK
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007316. PubMed ID: 31216884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration.
    Dupont M; Rickard J; Baranowski B; Varma N; Dresing T; Gabi A; Finucan M; Mullens W; Wilkoff BL; Tang WH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 60(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 22796255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of QRS Morphology and Duration on Clinical Outcomes After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy　- Analysis of Japanese Multicenter Registry.
    Oka T; Inoue K; Tanaka K; Hirao Y; Isshiki T; Kimura T; Nobuyoshi M; Shizuta S; Arita T; Fujii S; Iwakura K; Fujii K; Ando K
    Circ J; 2018 Jun; 82(7):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 29628460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of pacing site on QRS duration and its relationship to hemodynamic response in cardiac resynchronization therapy for congestive heart failure.
    Derval N; Bordachar P; Lim HS; Sacher F; Ploux S; Laborderie J; Steendijk P; Deplagne A; Ritter P; Garrigue S; Denis A; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Clementy J; Jaïs P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 24891271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators With Versus Without Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With a QRS Duration >180 ms.
    Sundaram V; Sahadevan J; Waldo AL; Stukenborg GJ; Reddy YNV; Asirvatham SJ; Mackall JA; Intini A; Wilson B; Simon DI; Bilchick KC
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 69(16):2026-2036. PubMed ID: 28427578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in electro-mechanical characteristics of left bundle branch block: Potential implications for selection and response of cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    De Pooter J; Kamoen V; El Haddad M; Stroobandt R; De Buyzere M; Jordaens L; Timmermans F
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 257():84-91. PubMed ID: 29506744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel electrocardiographic dyssynchrony criteria improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Vereckei A; Szelényi Z; Kutyifa V; Zima E; Szénási G; Kiss M; Katona G; Karádi I; Merkely B
    Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 28011802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Left bundle-branch block contraction patterns identified from radial-strain analysis predicts outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Wang CL; Wu CT; Yeh YH; Wu LS; Chan YH; Kuo CT; Chu PH; Hsu LA; Ho WJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 33(6):869-877. PubMed ID: 28150083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Narrower QRS may be enough to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy in lightweight patients.
    Nakai T; Mano H; Ikeya Y; Aizawa Y; Kurokawa S; Ohkubo K; Nagashima K; Watanabe I; Okumura Y
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Jun; 35(6):835-841. PubMed ID: 31776736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.