298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31104708)
1. Automatic reconstruction method for high-contrast panoramic image from dental cone-beam CT data.
Yun Z; Yang S; Huang E; Zhao L; Yang W; Feng Q
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():205-214. PubMed ID: 31104708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An automatic panoramic image reconstruction scheme from dental computed tomography images.
Papakosta TK; Savva AD; Economopoulos TL; Matsopoulos GK; Gröhndal HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Apr; 46(4):20160225. PubMed ID: 28112548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Research on panoramic image reconstruction based on oral cone beam computed tomography].
Zhang J; Jiang Y; Gao F; Zhao S; Song L
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 39(5):870-875. PubMed ID: 36310475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic Synthesis of Panoramic Radiographs from Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Data.
Luo T; Shi C; Zhao X; Zhao Y; Xu J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156976. PubMed ID: 27300554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semi-automatic and robust determination of dental arch form in dental cone-beam CT with B-spline approximation.
Bae M; Park JW; Kim N
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Apr; 172():95-101. PubMed ID: 30902131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic dental arch detection and panoramic image synthesis from CT images.
Sa-Ing V; Wangkaoom K; Thongvigitmanee SS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6099-102. PubMed ID: 24111131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
Bouwens DG; Cevidanes L; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 21195286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Panoramic dental tomosynthesis imaging by use of CBCT projection data.
Kwon T; Choi DI; Hwang J; Lee T; Lee I; Cho S
Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8817. PubMed ID: 37258603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic analysis algorithm for acquiring standard dental and mandibular shape data using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hwang JJ; Han SS; Lee C; Jung YH
Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13516. PubMed ID: 30202001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of mesiodistal tooth angulations determined through traditional panoramic radiographs and cone beam CT panoramic images].
Lei Q; Zhou L; Lei L; Wang Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 32(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 25241531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT.
Naitoh M; Saburi K; Gotoh K; Kurita K; Ariji E
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 23399788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study between currently used methods and Small Volume-Cone Beam Tomography for surgical placement of mini implants.
Landin M; Jadhav A; Yadav S; Tadinada A
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 25343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully automated estimation of arch forms in cone-beam CT with cubic B-spline approximation: Evaluation of digital dental models with missing teeth.
Bae M; Park JW; Kim N
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104256. PubMed ID: 33610000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Panoramic cone beam computed tomography.
Chang J; Zhou L; Wang S; Clifford Chao KS
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2930-46. PubMed ID: 22559664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
