219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31104881)
1. The Usefulness of Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis for Classifying the Voice Severity.
Lee Y; Kim G; Kwon S
J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):884-893. PubMed ID: 31104881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Usefulness of Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis as a Screening Test for Voice Problems.
Lee Y; Kim G; Sohn K; Lee B; Lee J; Kwon S
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2021; 73(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 31805562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of the Cepstral Spectral Acoustic Analysis for Classifying the Severity of Dysphonia.
İncebay Ö; Köse A; Esen Aydinli F; Awan SN; Gürsoy MD; Yilmaz T
J Voice; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36725408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of Cepstral Acoustic Analysis for Normal and Pathological Voice in the Japanese Language.
Mizuta M; Abe C; Taguchi E; Takeue T; Tamaki H; Haji T
J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):770-776. PubMed ID: 32951954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic Psychometric Severity Index of Dysphonia (APSID): Development and Clinical Application.
Lee SJ; Choi HS; Kim H
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e19-660.e25. PubMed ID: 31810840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of multi voice evaluation: Development of a model for predicting a degree of dysphonia.
Lee Y; Park H; Bae I; Kim G
J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):142.e5-142.e12. PubMed ID: 33199080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Cepstral Analysis Based on Voiced-Segment Extraction and Voice Tasks for Discriminating Dysphonic and Normophonic Korean Speakers.
Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee YW
J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):328.e11-328.e22. PubMed ID: 31640898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the cepstral acoustic characteristics of voice in healthy children.
Demirci AN; Köse A; Aydinli FE; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 148():110815. PubMed ID: 34217000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
Heman-Ackah YD; Sataloff RT; Laureyns G; Lurie D; Michael DD; Heuer R; Rubin A; Eller R; Chandran S; Abaza M; Lyons K; Divi V; Lott J; Johnson J; Hillenbrand J
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 25179777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep learning in automatic detection of dysphonia: Comparing acoustic features and developing a generalizable framework.
Chen Z; Zhu P; Qiu W; Guo J; Li Y
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Mar; 58(2):279-294. PubMed ID: 36117378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic and Perceptual Classification of Within-sample Normal, Intermittently Dysphonic, and Consistently Dysphonic Voice Types.
Gaskill CS; Awan JA; Watts CR; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):218-228. PubMed ID: 27241579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
