These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31105507)

  • 1. An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis.
    Hsieh SH; Lee SM; Li CS; Tu SH
    Stat Methods Appt; 2016 Nov; 25(4):601-621. PubMed ID: 31105507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimates of Lifetime Extradyadic Sex Using a Hybrid of Randomized Response Technique and Crosswise Design.
    Tu SH; Hsieh SH
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 27164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corrected estimator of sensitive population proportion using unknown repeated trials in the unrelated question randomized response model.
    Grover LK; Kaur A
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1337-1342. PubMed ID: 32141095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Randomized Response Approach in Public Health Research: An Empirical Study on the Factors of Illegal Waste Disposal.
    Chong ACY; Chu AMY; So MKP; Chung RSW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30889857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of a randomized response technique for the sensitive question survey in female sex workers in Xichang, China.
    Chen K; Mao Z; Jin Z; Gao G; Bian C
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jan; 10(1):392-403. PubMed ID: 33474945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the dependence of mixed sensitive response types in randomized response technique.
    Chu AM; So MK; Chan TW; Tiwari A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):894-910. PubMed ID: 31124400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining conservation compliance with randomized response technique analyses.
    Chang CH; Cruyff MJLF; Giam X
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 29752832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the prevalence of xenophobia and anti-Semitism in Germany: A comparison of randomized response and direct questioning.
    Krumpal I
    Soc Sci Res; 2012 Nov; 41(6):1387-403. PubMed ID: 23017963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.
    Höglinger M; Jann B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201770. PubMed ID: 30106973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RRTCS: An R Package for Randomized Response Techniques in Complex Surveys.
    Del Mar Rueda M; Cobo B; Arcos A
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jan; 40(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 29881039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-randomized response model for sensitive survey with noncompliance.
    Wu Q; Tang ML
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2827-2839. PubMed ID: 24807876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applications of segmented regression models for biomedical studies.
    Berman NG; Wong WK; Bhasin S; Ipp E
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Apr; 270(4 Pt 1):E723-32. PubMed ID: 8928781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The proportional odds model for multivariate interval-censored failure time data.
    Chen MH; Tong X; Sun J
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5147-61. PubMed ID: 17476643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new non-randomized model for analysing sensitive questions with binary outcomes.
    Tian GL; Yu JW; Tang ML; Geng Z
    Stat Med; 2007 Oct; 26(23):4238-52. PubMed ID: 17351882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Republic of Georgia estimates for prevalence of drug use: Randomized response techniques suggest under-estimation.
    Kirtadze I; Otiashvili D; Tabatadze M; Vardanashvili I; Sturua L; Zabransky T; Anthony JC
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2018 Jun; 187():300-304. PubMed ID: 29704851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of the randomized response technique in rural Ethiopia.
    Chow LP; Gruhn W; Chang WP
    Am J Public Health; 1979 Mar; 69(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 420374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal indirect standardization using latent clustering on multiple hospitals.
    Wang Y; Tancredi DJ; Miglioretti DL
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):554-566. PubMed ID: 34866217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A controlled randomized response technique.
    Williams BL; Suen HK; Baffi CR
    Eval Health Prof; 1993 Jun; 16(2):225-38. PubMed ID: 10125778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling and E-M estimation of haplotype-specific relative risks from genotype data for a case-control study of unrelated individuals.
    Stram DO; Leigh Pearce C; Bretsky P; Freedman M; Hirschhorn JN; Altshuler D; Kolonel LN; Henderson BE; Thomas DC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(4):179-90. PubMed ID: 14566096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On an exponential bound for the Kaplan-Meier estimator.
    Wellner JA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Dec; 13(4):481-96. PubMed ID: 17805966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.