These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31106084)
1. Quantitative Readability Assessment of the Internal Medicine Online Patient Information on Annals.org. Abu-Heija AA; Shatta M; Ajam M; Abu-Heija U; Imran N; Levine D Cureus; 2019 Mar; 11(3):e4184. PubMed ID: 31106084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis. Lim B; Chai A; Shaalan M Cureus; 2024 May; 16(5):e60536. PubMed ID: 38887325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources. Gulbrandsen TR; Skalitzky MK; Ryan SE; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Brown TS; Elkins JM Iowa Orthop J; 2022; 42(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 36601227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability. Docimo S; Seeras K; Acho R; Pryor A; Spaniolas K Hernia; 2022 Jun; 26(3):779-786. PubMed ID: 35344107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material. O'Reilly OC; Skalitzky MK; Kesler KK; Shamrock AG; Gao B; Gulbrandsen TR; Bollier MJ Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 38919367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability Analysis of Otolaryngology Consent Documents on the iMed Consent Platform. Hannabass K; Lee J Mil Med; 2023 Mar; 188(3-4):780-785. PubMed ID: 35022788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability. Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material. Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material. Kapoor K; George P; Evans MC; Miller WJ; Liu SS Cardiology; 2017; 138(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 28571004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability and quality assessment of online patient education materials for spinal and epidural anesthesia. Rai R; Wiseman JJ; Chau A; Wiseman SM Can J Anaesth; 2024 Aug; 71(8):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 38773007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology. Betschart P; Zumstein V; Bentivoglio M; Engeler D; Schmid HP; Abt D Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Dec; 49(12):2111-2117. PubMed ID: 28905177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information. Frost JC; Baldwin AJ Infect Dis Health; 2023 May; 28(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 36564245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials. Kasabwala K; Misra P; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Baredes S; Setzen M; Eloy JA Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Apr; 3(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 23044857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma. Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008. Roberts H; Zhang D; Dyer GS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e70. PubMed ID: 27605695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the Readability of Online Blood Cancer Education Materials Across Different Readability Measures. Shin A; Banubakode S; Taveras Alam S; Gonzalez AO Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58488. PubMed ID: 38765438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability of Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo.org: Has There Been Progress Over the Past 5 Years? Bange M; Huh E; Novin SA; Hui FK; Yi PH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):875-879. PubMed ID: 31386570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Anxiety and COVID-19: A study of online content readability. Seidel EJ; Hillyer GC; Basch CH J Prev Interv Community; 2021; 49(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 33871313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]