These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31106447)

  • 1. The association of inpatient blood utilization and diagnosis-related group weight: implications for risk-adjusted benchmarking.
    Metcalf RA; White SK; Potter S; Barney R; Hunter C; White M; Enniss T; Galaviz C; Reddy S; Wanner N; Schmidt RL; Blaylock R
    Transfusion; 2019 Jul; 59(7):2316-2323. PubMed ID: 31106447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA.
    Shen Y
    Med Care; 2003 Jun; 41(6 Suppl):II103-10. PubMed ID: 12773832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ICD-9-based illness severity score: a new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization.
    Rutledge R; Osler T
    J Trauma; 1998 Oct; 45(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 9783623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The trauma registry compared to All Patient Refined Diagnosis Groups (APR-DRG).
    Hackworth J; Askegard-Giesmann J; Rouse T; Benneyworth B
    Injury; 2017 May; 48(5):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 28062099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
    Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lifting the weight of a diagnosis-related groups family change: a comparison between refined and non-refined DRG systems for top-down cost accounting and efficiency indicators.
    Zlotnik A; Cuchi MA; Pérez Pérez MC
    Health Inf Manag; 2015; 44(2):12-9. PubMed ID: 26157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.
    Muldoon JH
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. APR DRG weights and the relationship to patient falls.
    McAlister S
    Nurs Econ; 2009; 27(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19492776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Red cell transfusions in coronary artery bypass surgery (DRGs 106 and 107).
    Surgenor DM; Wallace EL; Churchill WH; Hao SH; Chapman RH; Collins JJ
    Transfusion; 1992 Jun; 32(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 1626350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of coding within clinical datasets: A case-study using burn-related hospitalizations.
    Souza J; Santos JV; Lopes F; Freitas A
    Burns; 2019 Nov; 45(7):1571-1584. PubMed ID: 31395460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of the All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups Severity of Illness and Risk of Mortality Classification with Outcomes.
    Elgwairi E; Yang S; Nugent K
    South Med J; 2021 Oct; 114(10):668-674. PubMed ID: 34599349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfusion practice in Helsinki University Central Hospital: an analysis of diagnosis-related groups (DRG).
    Syrjälä MT; Kytöniemi I; Mikkolainen K; Ranimo J; Lauharanta J
    Transfus Med; 2001 Dec; 11(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 11851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of coding co-morbidities for APR-DRG assignment: Focus on cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.
    Souza J; Santos JV; Canedo VB; Betanzos A; Alves D; Freitas A
    Health Inf Manag; 2020 Jan; 49(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 31043088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool?
    Romano PS; Chan BK
    Health Serv Res; 2000 Mar; 34(7):1469-89. PubMed ID: 10737448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DRG benchmarking: analysis of service structures and -differences in dermatology departments.
    Fürstenberg T; Gierling P; Irps S; Gollnick H; Kaufmann R; Stadler R; Rompel R; Hensen P
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2014 Jul; 12(7):594-604. PubMed ID: 24846553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the diagnosis related grouping model's ability to explain length of stay of elderly medical inpatients by incorporating function-linked variables.
    Sahadevan S; Earnest A; Koh YL; Lee KM; Soh CH; Ding YY
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2004 Sep; 33(5):614-22. PubMed ID: 15531958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a risk-adjusted blood utilization metric.
    Stonemetz JL; Allen PX; Wasey J; Rivers RJ; Ness PM; Frank SM
    Transfusion; 2014 Oct; 54(10 Pt 2):2716-23. PubMed ID: 24611645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of Hospitalization Resource Intensity Scores for Kids (H-RISK) and Comparison across Pediatric Populations.
    Richardson T; Rodean J; Harris M; Berry J; Gay JC; Hall M
    J Hosp Med; 2018 Sep; 13(9):602-608. PubMed ID: 29694460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of casemix classification for output funding of blood services in Victoria. Victorian Blood Users Group.
    Whyte GS; Brook CW
    Med J Aust; 1998 Oct; 169(8):415-8. PubMed ID: 9830388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality of medical database to valorize the DRG model by ISA cost indicators].
    Holstein J; Taright N; Lepage E; Razafimamonjy J; Duboc D; Feldman L; Hittinger L; Lavergne T; Chatellier G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Dec; 50(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 12515929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.