189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31106990)
1. Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual-energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Lu KM; Yeh DM; Cao BH; Lin CY; Liang CY; Zhou YB; Tsai CJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):170-177. PubMed ID: 31106990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.
Ding H; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):4719-38. PubMed ID: 22771941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(12):2563-76. PubMed ID: 15272674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.
Molloi S; Ducote JL; Ding H; Feig SA
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081917. PubMed ID: 25086548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
Ducote JL; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast density quantification in dual-energy mammography using virtual anthropomorphic phantoms.
Pacheco G; Castillo-Lopez JP; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Brandan ME
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14360. PubMed ID: 38648734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Error analysis of calibration materials on dual-energy mammography.
Mou X; Chen X
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):596-603. PubMed ID: 18044617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of calibration phantom errors on dual-energy digital mammography.
Mou X; Chen X; Sun L; Yu H; Ji Z; Zhang L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6321-36. PubMed ID: 18936520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.
Laidevant AD; Malkov S; Flowers CI; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 20175478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.
Koukou V; Martini N; Michail C; Sotiropoulou P; Fountzoula C; Kalyvas N; Kandarakis I; Nikiforidis G; Fountos G
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():574238. PubMed ID: 26246848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography.
Ranger NT; Lo JY; Samei E
Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):962-9. PubMed ID: 20384232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
