BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31107837)

  • 1. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.
    Hernandez-Moreno L; Vallelado-Alvarez A; Martin R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 66(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 30127136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
    Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.
    Arslantürk Eren M; Nalcı Baytaroğlu H; Atilla H
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 54(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 38644780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
    Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Pesudovs K; Weisinger HS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):554-8. PubMed ID: 15252356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
    Gwiazda J; Weber C
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 15342056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Viewing Conditions and Vision Anomalies on Accuracy and Dynamics of Noncycloplegic Autorefraction.
    Kiermasz J; Sobol M; Pniewski J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Dec; 99(12):844-852. PubMed ID: 36594753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability and agreement of ARK-30 autorefraction after cataract surgery.
    de Juan V; Herreras JM; Martin R; Morejon A; Perez I; Rio-Cristobal A; Rodriguez G
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 40(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21745261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of a Smartphone-based Autorefractor Compared with Criterion-standard Refraction.
    Jeganathan VSE; Valikodath N; Niziol LM; Hansen S; Apostolou H; Woodward MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Dec; 95(12):1135-1141. PubMed ID: 30451804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.