BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31107837)

  • 21. [Accuracy of three common optometry methods in examination of refraction in juveniles].
    Su T; Min X; Liu S; Li F; Tan X; Zhong Y; Deng S
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 41(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 26932216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does the Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Estimates Depend on the Measurement Principle of Autorefractors?
    Padhy D; Bharadwaj SR; Nayak S; Rath S; Das T
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):2. PubMed ID: 33505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
    Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Soroush S; Yekta A; Dadbin N; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1122-7. PubMed ID: 26541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
    Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.
    Hernández CS; Gil A; Zaytouny A; Casares I; Poderoso J; de Lara A; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E; Alejandre-Alba N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):311-320. PubMed ID: 38084770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error.
    Wei X; Li L; Jiang L; Lu H; Huang H; Zhong D; Pan L; Wei D; Han Y; Lin H; Chen Q
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 38012552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accommodative accuracy by retinoscopy versus autorefraction spherical equivalent or horizontal meridian power.
    Nguyen AT; Wayne JL; Ravikumar A; Manny RE; Anderson HA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Nov; 101(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 29575034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
    Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
    Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
    Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight handheld autorefractor versus cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopic refraction.
    Iuorno JD; Grant WD; Noël LP
    J AAPOS; 2004 Apr; 8(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15088044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cycloplegic refraction in preschool children: comparisons between the hand-held autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy.
    Prabakaran S; Dirani M; Chia A; Gazzard G; Fan Q; Leo SW; Ling Y; Au Eong KG; Wong TY; Saw SM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 19523087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.