648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31109515)
1. Characterisation of source-separated, rigid plastic waste and evaluation of recycling initiatives: Effects of product design and source-separation system.
Eriksen MK; Astrup TF
Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():161-172. PubMed ID: 31109515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closing the loop for PET, PE and PP waste from households: Influence of material properties and product design for plastic recycling.
Eriksen MK; Christiansen JD; Daugaard AE; Astrup TF
Waste Manag; 2019 Aug; 96():75-85. PubMed ID: 31376972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recycling potential of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in Finland.
Dahlbo H; Poliakova V; Mylläri V; Sahimaa O; Anderson R
Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():52-61. PubMed ID: 29097129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circular economy of plastic packaging: Current practice and perspectives in Austria.
Van Eygen E; Laner D; Fellner J
Waste Manag; 2018 Feb; 72():55-64. PubMed ID: 29196054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contamination in plastic recycling: Influence of metals on the quality of reprocessed plastic.
Eriksen MK; Pivnenko K; Olsson ME; Astrup TF
Waste Manag; 2018 Sep; 79():595-606. PubMed ID: 30343792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plastic waste from recycling centres: Characterisation and evaluation of plastic recyclability.
Faraca G; Astrup T
Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():388-398. PubMed ID: 31351625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive model for the Dutch post-consumer plastic packaging recycling system and implications for the circular economy.
Brouwer MT; Thoden van Velzen EU; Augustinus A; Soethoudt H; De Meester S; Ragaert K
Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():62-85. PubMed ID: 29107509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detailed Analysis of the Composition of Selected Plastic Packaging Waste Products and Its Implications for Mechanical and Thermochemical Recycling.
Roosen M; Mys N; Kusenberg M; Billen P; Dumoulin A; Dewulf J; Van Geem KM; Ragaert K; De Meester S
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(20):13282-13293. PubMed ID: 32985869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic Material Flow Analysis of PET, PE, and PP Flows in Europe: Evaluation of the Potential for Circular Economy.
Eriksen MK; Pivnenko K; Faraca G; Boldrin A; Astrup TF
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(24):16166-16175. PubMed ID: 33225689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plastic flexible films waste management - A state of art review.
Horodytska O; Valdés FJ; Fullana A
Waste Manag; 2018 Jul; 77():413-425. PubMed ID: 29691112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-consumer plastic packaging waste in England: Assessing the yield of multiple collection-recycling schemes.
Hahladakis JN; Purnell P; Iacovidou E; Velis CA; Atseyinku M
Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():149-159. PubMed ID: 29439928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recycling of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in the EU: Recovery rates, material flows, and barriers.
Antonopoulos I; Faraca G; Tonini D
Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():694-705. PubMed ID: 33887695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The environmental benefits of improving packaging waste collection in Europe.
Tallentire CW; Steubing B
Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 103():426-436. PubMed ID: 31952024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the quantity of separated post-consumer plastics for reducing combustible household waste: The case of rigid plastics in Flanders.
Jacobsen R; Willeghems G; Gellynck X; Buysse J
Waste Manag; 2018 Aug; 78():708-716. PubMed ID: 32559963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of collection portfolio expansion on key performance indicators of the Dutch recycling system for Post-Consumer Plastic Packaging Waste, a comparison between 2014 and 2017.
Brouwer M; Picuno C; Thoden van Velzen EU; Kuchta K; De Meester S; Ragaert K
Waste Manag; 2019 Dec; 100():112-121. PubMed ID: 31536921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tracing the origin of VOCs in post-consumer plastic film bales.
Roosen M; Van Laere T; Decottignies V; Morel L; Schnitzler JL; Schneider J; Schlummer M; Lase IS; Dumoulin A; De Meester S
Chemosphere; 2023 May; 324():138281. PubMed ID: 36868415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recyclability assessment of nano-reinforced plastic packaging.
Sánchez C; Hortal M; Aliaga C; Devis A; Cloquell-Ballester VA
Waste Manag; 2014 Dec; 34(12):2647-55. PubMed ID: 25263216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical properties of plastic packaging waste for recycling: A case study on non-beverage plastic bottles in an urban MSW system in Austria.
Gritsch L; Breslmayer G; Rainer R; Stipanovic H; Tischberger-Aldrian A; Lederer J
Waste Manag; 2024 Jul; 185():10-24. PubMed ID: 38815530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical Recycling of Packaging Plastics: A Review.
Schyns ZOG; Shaver MP
Macromol Rapid Commun; 2021 Feb; 42(3):e2000415. PubMed ID: 33000883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality comparison of plastic packaging waste from different separation systems: Result enhancement with non-negative matrix factorization of FTIR spectra.
Klingenberg P; Brüll R; Fell T; Barton B; Soll M; Emans T; Bakker F; Geertz G
Waste Manag; 2024 Apr; 178():135-143. PubMed ID: 38401427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
