These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31109530)

  • 41. Pilot-based assessment of the economics of recycling construction demolition waste.
    Srour IM; Chehab GR; El-Fadel M; Tamraz S
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1170-9. PubMed ID: 23460542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Value stream mapping for identification and assessment of material waste in construction: A case study.
    Vilventhan A; Ram VG; Sugumaran S
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Aug; 37(8):815-825. PubMed ID: 31213142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Construction waste modelling for residential construction projects in New Zealand to enhance design outcomes.
    Domingo N; Batty T
    Waste Manag; 2021 Feb; 120():484-493. PubMed ID: 33191050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recycling of Mining Waste in the Production of Masonry Units.
    Cobîrzan N; Muntean R; Thalmaier G; Felseghi RA
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 35057312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantifying and managing plastic waste generated from building construction in Auckland, New Zealand.
    Hernandez G; Low J; Nand A; Bu A; Wallis SL; Kestle L; Berry TA
    Waste Manag Res; 2023 Jan; 41(1):205-213. PubMed ID: 35698793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Factors influencing temporary wood waste generation in high-rise building construction.
    Kern AP; Amor LV; Angulo SC; Montelongo A
    Waste Manag; 2018 Aug; 78():446-455. PubMed ID: 32559932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Estimation of building-related construction and demolition waste in Shanghai.
    Ding T; Xiao J
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2327-34. PubMed ID: 25164857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the role and use of recycled aggregates in the sustainable management of construction and demolition waste via a mini-review and a case study.
    Hahladakis JN; Purnell P; Aljabri HMSJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):460-471. PubMed ID: 31916495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A cost compensation model for construction and demolition waste disposal in South China.
    Liu J; Teng Y; Jiang Y; Gong E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(14):13773-13784. PubMed ID: 30128974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding loading patterns of construction waste hauling trucks: triangulation between big quantitative and informative qualitative data.
    Lu W; Yuan L; Lee WMW
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(33):50867-50880. PubMed ID: 35239120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand.
    Kofoworola OF; Gheewala SH
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):731-8. PubMed ID: 18774703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios.
    Fořt J; Černý R
    Waste Manag; 2020 Dec; 118():510-520. PubMed ID: 32980730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A study on the waste generation rates and recycling potential for the construction and demolition waste in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    Haque SE; Nahar N; Haque MS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jan; 196(2):183. PubMed ID: 38253941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling construction and demolition waste in the Greater Bay Area, China: Status quo and future scenarios.
    Peng Z; Lu W; Webster CJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148427. PubMed ID: 34144235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Waste generated in high-rise buildings construction: a quantification model based on statistical multiple regression.
    Parisi Kern A; Ferreira Dias M; Piva Kulakowski M; Paulo Gomes L
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():35-44. PubMed ID: 25704604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Extended theory of planned behaviour for promoting construction waste recycling in Hong Kong.
    Mak TMW; Yu IKM; Wang L; Hsu SC; Tsang DCW; Li CN; Yeung TLY; Zhang R; Poon CS
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jan; 83():161-170. PubMed ID: 30514463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Current state of building demolition and potential for selective dismantling in Vietnam.
    Hoang NH; Ishigaki T; Watari T; Yamada M; Kawamoto K
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jul; 149():218-227. PubMed ID: 35752109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantitative methods for predicting underground construction waste considering reuse and recycling.
    Chen R; Li L; Yang K; Ren F; Xi C; Lin Y; Zheng H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(3):3394-3405. PubMed ID: 34389947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China.
    Lu W; Yuan H; Li J; Hao JJ; Mi X; Ding Z
    Waste Manag; 2011 Apr; 31(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 21208794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clean construction and demolition waste material cycles through optimised pre-demolition waste audit documentation: A review on building material assessment tools.
    Rašković M; Ragossnig AM; Kondracki K; Ragossnig-Angst M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):923-941. PubMed ID: 32635832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.